CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building (Near Post Office)
Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
Tel: +91-11-26161796
Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2010/000539/7424
Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2010/000539
Relevant Facts
emerging from the Appeal
Appellant : Ms. Kaushar
445, Gali Sarote Wali,
Matia Mahal, Jama Masjid,
Delhi – 110006
Respondent : Mr. T. P. Sharma
Public Information Officer & Assistant Commissioner
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
O/o Assistant Commissioner
City Zone, MLUG Car Parking
Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi.
RTI application filed on : 08/11/2009
PIO replied : 18/12/2009
First appeal filed on : 07/12/2009
First Appellate Authority order : No order.
Second Appeal received on : 26/02/2010
Date of Notice of Hearing : 12/03/2010
Hearing Held on : 09/04/2010
Sl. Information Sought Reply of the PIO
1. The orders passed by MCD with regard to the application filed by the The vending policy
Appellant on 14/05/2003. is under
2. Action taken by the City Zone of MCD. consideration.
3. The time frame within which space should have been provided to the When this is taken
Appellant and the action taken till date. you will be
4. The time frame within which shop will be allocated to the Appellant. informed.
5. The time limit within which action will be taken on the basis of the RTI
application.
Grounds for the First Appeal:
No information provided by the PIO.
Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):
No order passed by the FAA.
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
Unsatisfactory information provided by the PIO and no order passed by the FAA.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present
Appellant: Ms. Kaushar;
Respondent: Mr. T. P. Sharma, Public Information Officer & Assistant Commissioner;
The Appellant who is clearly handicapped had applied for allotment of ‘khokha’ in 2003
in the City Zone. The PIO shows that a decision has been taken by the Zonal Vending
Committee that since there is no available space in the city zone no khokhas can be allotted to
handicapped persons. The PIO however states that a persons residing in the city zone can request
for allotment of a khokha in another zone. Such requests are considered by the Central Licensing
Department. The Appellant is advised to apply at Central Licensing Department for allotment of
the khokha.
Decision:
The Appeal is disposed.
The information has been provided.
This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
9 April 2010
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (RR)