S.Mahadevaiah vs D.K.Girish on 16 December, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT-._
BANGALORE i»j,1

DATED THIS THE 16'?" DAY OF DECEME-fi'R:§€FiQ  

BEFORE;  

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE Ii{IL:{i_ViAIiI;G.RAM;§§S:¥i'1 

CRIMINAL,   
BETWEEN: [A it it i

S.Mahadevaiah,  

S/OIat€Sidd£1i£ih,w   .  »

Aged about 75§~y'e.23j.rV§',-  g  

R/at Doddatagrapetilffi/_i.l1age,.__    .
Chamarajarlagasj    

Chamaf3}ta.fl.?1{gai1'a I§i;St2*ic»t...V     ..APPELLANT

(By sr.i.K./at,'cina&;Eatghett§i;::'a; adv.)

AND:

 V    i ' ..... .. 9

8/0  D. B .,

' _A'ged 'about 4. 5 Ayeiars,

De i'xe.Ii«:)p.fne1fit.. Ofit icer,
I.1.C;, Of IV.nd_i_a<;..-- '
Chamatajanagar Branch,

T ' * * .  "'Ci1a1naragf.ahagz2r. ..RESPON DEN T

This Criminal Appeal is fiied under Section 378(4) of

  ~Cf.P.C. praying to set. aside the judgment and Order dated
 ,  23.05.2009 in C.C.NO.376/2006 On the fiie Of the Prl. Civil

'X



Judge. (Jr.Dn._) & }lVlFC., Chamarajanagar ~ acquitt,i'iig the
respondent/accused for the offence P/U/S. 138 of  

This Criminal Appeal coming on for

Court delivered the following:

,1unGMEN’t_* ”

This appeal is by the coznpiiaiinant challenging the order

of acquittal passed Vbyzx tl1e=l””}’MFC,v”e~Charnavfajanagar, in
C.C.No.376/2006 dated 23.0,5i,2oo§.r’

2. he had lent a loan of
towVatci3aV,iwh_:iCC’}l__aCCu3ed had issued a cheque dated
27.02.20l)6,_ Bank which, on presentation

for encashment,”carne to be dishonoured for insufficient funds.

is’isiiance..,of legal notice, due to nonmpayment, the

iconi.;3lain’t’iiV”_was3:.filed. The trial Court, after enquiry, has

.q dismi.’ss.eéI.thecomplaint. Hence, this appeal.

3. Heard.

\?</