High Court Kerala High Court

Bindu Devadas vs State Of Kerala on 4 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Bindu Devadas vs State Of Kerala on 4 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7303 of 2009()


1. BINDU DEVADAS,AGED 37 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. DEVADAS,AGED 42 YEARS,S/O.GOPALAN,
3. P.S.BABU,S/O.SUBRAMANYAN,AGED 40 YRS,
4. DEEPA.T.P,W/O.P.S.BABU,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :04/01/2010

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 7303 of 2009
                ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 4th day of January, 2010

                            O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused

Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.1211/2009 of Kalady Police Station,

Ernakulam.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioners is under

Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

15/12/2009, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor, I am of

the view that before disposing of the Bail Application,

an opportunity should be given to the petitioners to

appear before the investigating officer. Accordingly,

there will be a direction to the petitioners to appear

before the investigating officer at 9 A.M. on

18/12/2009. The petitioners shall produce a copy of

the order before the investigating officer.

B.A. No. 7303 /2009
2

Post on 21st December, 2009.

It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor

that the petitioners will not be arrested until further

orders in connection with Crime No. 1211 of 2009 of

Kalady Police Station, Ernakulam District.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor that the

petitioners have complied with the direction contained in the

order dated 15/12/2009.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

them on bail on their executing bond for Rs.15,000/-each with

two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

A) The petitioners shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

B.A. No. 7303 /2009
3

B) The petitioners shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

C) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm