High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Viju V T vs Smt Vani Shree on 27 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Viju V T vs Smt Vani Shree on 27 July, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
  FENDENG BEFGRE THE METROPOLITAN MAGSSTRATE,
 RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 12 0? THE PROTECTICXSS OF

¥N THE HIGH coum OF KAR¥\iA’¥’AKA AT BANGALORE
t’JATEI:2 THIS Ti-iE 27*” my CF JULY, 2909
BEFORE % M _ 4′
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH 3&5: ‘ ‘ j ;§
cRL.P.No.2wsz2gog ” ” H
BETWEEN: I * ‘ %

5’m.V!JU.V.T.

S10 THiMMA¥AH

A659 A3ou134–séi.EAH*3 4_ ‘
WA z~so.2o,a*’*’
sm M.v.NAeAH;%s:AMAMoovmf:+’r NAGAR
BANGAVLQRE-560

= . ..PETlTlONER

(av G.J:5AM;§»RI§HA{§;’;§{DXf’.’}~. ::”
AND.:_§ ”

S*MT.VA¥~3%SHFiEvE

Tvm ‘V}J’U _V.T’; ‘- %A

“AGED. Ai30LJ_T 29 YEARS

REA NOM4; s:;TaB.ANNAPALYA

mreaswgon «EAAIN ROAD

‘, sA:~:G:u..c2£:E-see ass. ..RESF’ONDENT

‘ * ff?CF¥L.?* HLEB UNQER 3502109: 432 caps PRAYING 70
~ GUASH THE macesarwes IN €:R¥_.§é£SC.PETN.NO.287I2009

‘TRAFF!C CQSRT-I, BANGALORE (NIT!/QTED 83’ THE
WGMEN LAW QOMESRC V!O§..SNCE ACT.

the fofiewing;

in consequence of the agreeméht tTHe.v%ABfie.dLaté>f;’%h:é~._VV

parties have rasolved their dispfl§.e:V§”ar§s¥ngAhiinderfliej gzirfiufiisicfis of ” ‘

the Protection of We-:¥:en;__from –V_io£e.réée–vAct,.. i2G05. in

View of the samg, the iri”Cr§VM§c.Petn.287/2009
penciing on the” .Metnfjpé§:litai_n (Traffic Coum),
Bangalore fiigoiived.

Sd/-

15699

This petition ccm¥ng can for orders this day,