Ch Memorial Eeducational And … vs National Council For Vocational … on 7 April, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 30692 of 2008(D)


1. CH MEMORIAL EEDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT

3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY

4. DIRECTOR OF TRAINING KERALA STATE,

5. DEPARTMENTAL INSPECTION COMMITTEE FOR

6. STANDING COMMITTEE FOR AFFILIATION

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.PAREETH

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :07/04/2009

 O R D E R
                            V.GIRI
            ----------------------------------------
               W.P.(C)No.30692 of 2008
           -----------------------------------------
        Dated this the 7th day of April, 2009.

                         JUDGMENT

The petitioner, stated to be an Educational

Charitable Trust, responded to a notification issued by the

Director of Training, the 4th respondent, inviting applications

for starting a new Industrial Training Centre. Ext.P3

provisional permission was granted to the petitioner.

According to the petitioner, the Departmental Inspection

Committee inspected the premises of the Industrial Training

Centre on 2.6.08 and was convinced of the facilities made

available by the petitioner. He refers to Ext.P7 in this

regard. The 4th respondent by Ext.P10 letter intimated the

petitioner that there will be an inspection by the standing

committee and the petitioner was required to remit the fees

for the same which he did. It is now contended that there

has not been proper inspection by the standing committee.

But the petitioner was met with Ext.P11 issued by the 4th

respondent stating that the standing committee, which

W.P.(C)No.30692 of 2008

:: 2 ::

inspected the Industrial Training Centre, has not

recommended any of the trades mentioned in the list due to

the deficiencies noted therein. The petitioner challenges

Ext.P11, inter alia, on the ground that the defects, if any,

noted in Ext.P11 are not existing. He, therefore, prays for a

direction to the 4th respondent to constitute a standing

committee to inspect the petitioner’s Industrial Training

Centre.

2. This court in W.P.(C)NO.31440/08 considered

the same prayer and issued an order directing that the

Regional Director, Directorate of National Council for

Vocational Training shall depute a representative to the

standing committee constituted by the 4th respondent

Director of Training, for inspection of the Industrial Training

Centre.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the 4th respondent to constitute a standing

committee and a representative be deputed by the Regional

W.P.(C)No.30692 of 2008

:: 3 ::

Directorate of the 1st respondent. This shall be done within

two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. Further action shall be taken based on the report

of the standing committee.

Sd/-

(V.GIRI)
JUDGE

sk/-

//true copy//