High Court Kerala High Court

George Samuel vs Indian Penta Costal Church Of God on 8 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
George Samuel vs Indian Penta Costal Church Of God on 8 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RSA.No. 577 of 2007()


1. GEORGE SAMUEL, S/O.LATE G. SAMUEL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. INDIAN PENTA COSTAL CHURCH OF GOD,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.HARILAL

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.R.VENKETESH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH

 Dated :08/01/2010

 O R D E R
                            THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.
                           --------------------------------------
                             R.S.A.Nos.1061 of 2006
                                            &
                                     577 of 2007
                           --------------------------------------
                    Dated this the 8th day of January, 2010.

                                     JUDGMENT

These appeals concern judgment and decree in O.S.No.204 of 1996 of

the court of learned Munsiff, Mavelikkara. That is a suit for declaration of title

and injunction filed by the plaintiff. After the death of defendant Nos.1 and 2

their legal representative, defendant No.3 filed a counter claim. Trial court

granted decree in favour of the plaintiff and dismissed the counter claim. The

decree in the suit and the dismissal of the counter claim were challenged in

A.S.No.160 of 2004. First appellate court allowed the appeal in part. Plaintiff

has come up in R.S.A.No.1061 of 2006 while R.S.A.No.577 of 2007 is filed by

defendant No.3.

2. Parties have settled their dispute outside the court and filed

compromise vide I.A.No.3049 of 2009 in R.S.A.No.577 of 2007.

3. I have heard counsel on both sides. It is requested by counsel on

both sides that these appeals may be disposed of in terms of the compromise.

RSA Nos.1061/2006 & 577/2007

2

Accordingly, the compromise is accepted and recorded. These appeals

are disposed of in terms of the compromise (vide I.A.No.3049 of 2009 in

R.S.A.No.577 of 2007). The compromise shall form part of the decree of this

Court. Parties will be entitled to refund of court fee as provided under the

relevant law.

I.A.No.1926 of 2008 in R.S.A.No.1061 of 2006 and I.A.No.1200 of 2007

in R.S.A.No.577 of 2007 will stand dismissed.

THOMAS P.JOSEPH,
Judge.

cks