High Court Kerala High Court

Aruchamy vs State Of Kerala on 6 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
Aruchamy vs State Of Kerala on 6 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7291 of 2009(F)


1. ARUCHAMY, S/O.KUMARASWAMY GOUNDER,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. CHAMIAPPA GOUDER,
3. KUMARASWAMY, S/O.APPACHY GOUNDER,
4. KARUPPASWAMY, S/O.ANGAPPA GOUNDER,
5. ARUMUGHAM.A., PRESIDENT,
6. A.RATHINAVELU, PRESIDENT, RBC EXTENDED

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,

3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND

4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PROJECT-I,

5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :06/03/2009

 O R D E R
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                   -------------------------
                      W.P.(C.) No.7291 of 2009
              ---------------------------------
              Dated, this the 6th day of March, 2009

                           J U D G M E N T

In this writ petition, the relief sought for is a direction to the

respondents to supply adequate water through the Moolathara Right

Bank Canal, which is a part of Kuriarkutty-Karappara Irrigation

Project. It is seen that the petitioners have already moved in this

behalf by filing Ext.P6 representation to the 4th respondent, and the

petitioners now seek a direction to the 4th respondent to consider

and pass orders on Ext.P6.

2. If as stated as above, Ext.P6 representation has been

received by the 4th respondent and is pending, there will be a

direction to the 4th respondent to consider the same and pass orders

thereon, immediately on production of a copy of this judgment.

3. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment,

along with a copy of this writ petition before the 4th respondent for

compliance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg