High Court Karnataka High Court

Meghdas vs The United India Insurance Co Ltd on 13 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Meghdas vs The United India Insurance Co Ltd on 13 January, 2009
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao S.N.Satyanarayana


3 NARASIMHAPPA

S/G. LATE VENKATAREYRPPA
MAJOR

R/AI NO. 10/1,

HAL MAIN ROAD

BANGALGRE — 71

{By Sri B C SEEIHARAMA’xA§;_ADV”?QR,RI,’ ”
R2–SERVED} *.’ ‘- I’

THIS MFA IS _IILED’ 3/s,.1?3{1} OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE 3UDGMENT- 3N3; AWARDz_DTD: 20.7.04
PASSED Ifi MVC NO.7é1/99 TQN Tag-3:23 OF THE XII
ADDL. JUDGE, *MEMBER;”uMACT;; BANGALORE, (SCCH–8}
PARTLY ALLCQING 2 Ina ‘«CLAIM f PETITION FOR

CQMPEMSATIOM fIANa:« »3EEKIxG ENHANCEMENT 0?
CGMPENSATIONJr “‘ ‘Cw *.’ I I

IHI3,§§§fifi;=CeMI§G’Gw~§oR ORDERS ?HIS DAY,
SREEEfiAR_RAG:Jg;kDELIUERED THE FOLLOWING:

“.’f.jU3GMENI

.5 Ndtice ta Iesyondent No.3 is @ispensed wiih.

»I;A,E is fiilgwed. The delay 3f 51 days in filing

th@_a§peal’§sscondened.

Tié’*ép§@llant~petitiener sustained fracture

u’of,3w find 4% ribs of right and left clavicle and

‘2icssA of five fieeth in the upper gaw. The

“uH_§etiti0ner was working as ea Asaistant Master in

Government fichool getting a salary’ of Rs.4S88f*

rounded off ta Rs.4,600/- per maath. The

5%

.f;AREs§ofiDENIsII. =.