High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

The Managing Committee And Others vs Mrs.R.K.Gautam And Others on 11 September, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
The Managing Committee And Others vs Mrs.R.K.Gautam And Others on 11 September, 2009
C.R.No.2051 of 2008 (O&M)


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH


                            C.R.No.2051 of 2008. (O&M)
                            Decided on: September 11, 2009.


The Managing Committee and others

                                                       .. Petitioners

                 VERSUS


Mrs.R.K.Gautam and others

                                                    .. Respondents

                            ***

CORAM:           HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI


PRESENT          Mr.D.S.Patwalia, Advocate,
                 for the petitioners.

                 Mr.P.S.Rana, Advocate,
                 for the respondents.

M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)

The documents taken on record.

During the course of arguments, counsel for the

respondent submitted that pursuant to the award which was passed

on 08.01.1978, the respondent cannot be taken in service after her

reinstatement as Principal in Indira Gandhi Mahila Mhavidyalaya,

Kaithal, as she is now 78 years of age and suffering from cancer.

On asking, counsel for the petitioner has placed on

record without prejudice to the right of the management the amount

… 1
C.R.No.2051 of 2008 (O&M)

calculated which would be payable to the respondent in case this

revision petition is presumed to be dismissed. The calculations

though have been disputed by respondent, indicate that a sum of

Rs.4.52 lacs, is payable to the respondent.

At the same time, counsel for the petitioner has

contended that as the matter remained stayed for number of years,

the proportionate cut should be imposed as the management should

not be burdened for any amount for which it is not responsible for

delay.

Taking into consideration, the age of the

respondents and the controversies raised in the revision petition, the

parties have been advised to amicably settle the matter and the

petitioners have been asked to pay a lump sum amount as one time

settlement.

Counsel for the respondents has agreed to give up

all her claims in case a sum of Rs.3.5 lacs is paid to the respondents

within three equal monthly installments.

The offer given by the respondents has been

accepted by counsel for the petitioners on the instructions of Sh.Ram

Bahadur, Vice President, Governing Body, and has stated that the

management will pay an amount of Rs.3.5 lacs.

However, counsel for the petitioners submit that

Indira Gandhi Mahila Mhavidyalaya, Kaithal, being governed by grant

-in-aid Rules of 1981, the management is entitled to share the

financial burden with the Government as per the rules.

… 2
C.R.No.2051 of 2008 (O&M)

It will be open to the Managing Committee to

recover the amount, if any, payable under rules from the State, if so

advised and permissible under law.

This revision petition is disposed of as having been

compromised. A sum of Rs.3.5 lacs will be paid by the petitioners in

three equal monthly installments. First installment of Rs.1.5 lacs will

be paid to the respondents by 01.10.2009. The remaining two

installments of Rs.1 lac, each will be paid by Ist November 2009, and

Ist December 2009. It will be open to the Managing Committee to

hand over three post-dated cheques.

Disposed of.

(M.M.S.BEDI)
JUDGE
September 11, 2009.

rka

… 3