The Managing Director Nwkrtc vs Shashikala W/O Basavaraj Totager on 18 March, 2008

:2-; -3; I.e;;___A coum or KAR.ll_A1'M§A.__.

.=.:-,-*1-'-----.,-_ ---...,-v

name 93:;  A1;-.1'! EA? 9! Mmflu " A _   

Tam Hanna am. *§'A'_"c=fiA  ?a'z'aeA.:.§?.3%? A  

      
K.H.DOUBLi§ROAD  . 
SHANTI' ', u    
 >   "  

 QGNTROLLERE
N;W.K.IP.T;€3   »     ~
aaisaa Di'«?1S§§3N  _  "

GADAG REP'vBY"4CH_IEF:LAW OFFICER-

NOW! KI  '  '' pt I   IT -

54,B,yfszj: KALEEMULLAH SHARiF'F', :'\'"v' 3% A

" ''*SHAF§fi!KPfi;A w/0_ BASAVARAJ TOTAGER A

  3"hGn\rnDA_l mrvrnnnnn

_l1§fl'l."II\l'lR-I "I 'J I \-!'l I-V-_lI--_l'l\

"AGE;34YRs

HCIUSEHOLEJ wow:

 'A *=._R/O MUDDEBIHAL A
-  BIJAPURA DISTRICF. % % ,,..RESPGN'DEI'w'T'

THIS MFA FILED UIS-173(1) OF Mv 'ACT mains?-
THE -JUDGMENT AND . AWARD "DATED: 1210512005

-"PASSED IN Mvc: -NO.254I'.2001 on THE FILE OF THE
,L;EARr.'En czvn. JUI-')GE- {sauna} er; 'MEM_BER,_ MAC'I'_--8,

MUDDEBI HAL, AWARDING COMPENSATION" I OF



2

S 13,e..o,:-- .c.)(.}_._H1;12 wrm cosrs AND_;i'f€TEQ'ES'!§" AT

'l'Hl§ PPE L, COMING oN~~mR Qié%'VtEi2s,V'*rHts DAY» _ 

T 7E CC/DU RT' DE' TVISRED TH ' F7GL%%l '  A .

returned  the ezi&uri3e1iiefit_*if1erf"+leue auumss". .he
appellalgut.  tp   oormect address of the
respq1_;de:.1t."-- 1111 otlxzefkirertiés, the appellant is negligent in

ené-spxigzgt  appeal is Lgerved on Respondent

No.1,’ In that view of the matter, the

appeal as against R-1. As a consequence.

” A

KS