High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md.Rais Khan &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 10 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Md.Rais Khan &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 10 August, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CWJC No.2017 of 2010
1. MD. RAIS KHAN S/O MD. AKHAR ALI KHAN R/O VILL.- DASHBACHAK,
P.S.- FATEHPUR, DISTT.- GAYA
2. BINOD KUMAR THAKUR S/O SRI SHYAM DEO THAKUR R/O SHANTI NEKATAN
VIDYALAYA, BALJORI BIGHA, KATARI, P.S.- KATARI, DISTT.- GAYA
3. BINOD BIHARI S/O SRI RAMOTAR SINGH R/O VILL.- GURYABA, P.S.-
MOHANPUR, DISTT.- GAYA
4. SHAHID HASAN KHAN S/O MD. ABDUL HASAN KHAN R/O VILL.- KARHARA,
P.S.- SHERGHATI, DISTT.- GAYA
5. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH S/O SRI DEONANDAN PRASAD SINGH R/O BABURA
KHOTI, GHUGHANITAND, DANDIBAGH, P.S.- CHANCHURA, DISTT.- GAYA
6. RAM DHAIN SAO S/O LATE GAYA SAO R/O VILL.- SAEDPUR BAZAR,
KHIJARSARAI, P.S.- KHIJARSARAI, DISTT.- GAYA
7. RAJU RAJAK S/O LATE BRIKSH RAJAK R/O VILL.- SAEDPUR BAZAR,
KHIJARSARAI, P.S.- KHIJARSARAI, DISTT.- GAYA
8. SURESH CHOUDHARY S/O LATE MUNSHI CHOUDHARY R/O VILL.- BASATHI
TOLA, SABALPUR, P.S.- BODH GAYA, DISTT.- GAYA
9. NAND LAL RAM S/O SRI RAMKRIT RAM R/O VILL.- RAM NAGAR, P.S. -
TEKHARI, DISTT.- GAYA
10. ASHOK KUMAR S/O SRI RAJENDRA PRASAD R/O C/O PROF. BALKRISHNA
CHITRAGUPTA GALI, MAHARANI ROAD, P.S.- SADAR, DISTT.- GAYA
11. SURESH PRASAD S/O SRI JAGDISH PRASAD R/O MOHALLA-
NARAYANCHUA, P.S.- CHANCHURA, DISTT.- GAYA
                                     Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE null GAYA
2. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (ESTABLISHMENT) GAYA COLLECTORATE,
DISTT.- GAYA
3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (NAZARAT) GAYA COLLECTORATE, DISTT.-
GAYA
                                  -----------

2/ 10/08/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned counsel for the State.

The grievance of the petitioner is in context of a

panel prepared on 23.5.2008. The life of a panel in law is

for one year as otherwise it violates Article-14 of the

Constitution of India by shutting out from consideration

others who may become eligible in the meantime by

continuing a panel unreasonably for a prolonged time. No

statutory provision has been shown that the panel in
-2-

question was to have a life beyond one year in law. The

writ petition itself has been filed after the life of the panel

on 13.2.2010. No orders can be passed on a panel extinct

in the eye of law. The respondents cannot make any

appointments from any panel prepared on 23.5.2008 in

the year 2010. The respondents are bound to proceed

afresh in accordance with law only.

The writ application is disposed.

KC                                ( Navin Sinha, J.)