High Court Kerala High Court

S.Jayathilakan vs The Regional Provident … on 1 February, 2008

Kerala High Court
S.Jayathilakan vs The Regional Provident … on 1 February, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 3901 of 2008(M)


1. S.JAYATHILAKAN ,RETIRED ASST.MANAGER
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT COMMISSIONER
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE ASST. GENERAL MANAGER (CPF)

3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (SOUTH)

4. THE DISTRICT MANAGER

                For Petitioner  :SMT.P.K.SANTHAMMA

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE, SC, FCI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :01/02/2008

 O R D E R
                                  V.GIRI,J.

                           -------------------------

                      W.P ( C) No. 3901 of 2008

                           --------------------------

                 Dated this the 1st  February, 2008


                             J U D G M E N T

Petitioner was an employee of the Food Corporation of

India. He retired from service as Assistant Manager (Quality

Control) of the Food Corporation of India on 2.12.2004.

Employees Family Pension Scheme was introduced in FCI in

1996. The details of the employees pension scheme is contained

in Ext.P1. It is admitted that the petitioner is a member of the

employees pension scheme, which is a contributory pension

scheme. Payment of contribution is as per clause – iii of Ext.P1.

Petitioner has eligible service and is entitled to get pension. His

grievance is that necessary returns are not forwarded to the first

respondent, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and

therefore the pension is yet to be disbursed to him.

2. Mr. Jacob Varghese, learned standing counsel for the

Food corporation of India, on instructions, submits that he has

already instructed the competent authority to forward the annual

return, in relation to the petitioner and needful shall be done

W.P ( C) No. 3901 of 2008

3

without any further delay. Standing counsel for the first

respondent Smt.Girija submits that immediately on receipt of the

annual return from the FCI, steps will be taken to disburse the

pension due and admissible to the petitioner. These submissions

are recorded.

3. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of in

the following terms:

1) Annual return, relating to the petitioner, for the purpose

of Employees Pension Scheme, shall be forwarded by the

concerned District Manager of the Food Corporation of India , as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one

month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, to the

first respondent – Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

2) Immediately on receipt of the said annual return from

the District Manager of the Food Corporation of India, the first

respondent- Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall verify

the eligibility of the petitioner in relation thereto and then

proceed to disburse pension due and admissible to him, within a

period of one month thereafter. It is made clear that if there is

delay in forwarding of the annual return, then the Food

W.P ( C) No. 3901 of 2008

3

Corporation of India will be made liable for payment of interest

for the amount due to the petitioner, after the period of one

month as mentioned above. Similarly, if there is delay in the

disbursal of pension due to the petitioner, after receiving of the

annual return, first respondent will also liable to pay interest to

the petitioner for the delayed payment.

V. GIRI, JUDGE

ma

W.P ( C) No. 3901 of 2008

3

(V.GIRI, JUDGE)

ma

W.P ( C) No. 3901 of 2008

3

K.THANKAPPAN,J

CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999

ORDER

25th May, 2007