High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Present: Mr.Sarju Puri vs Unknown on 30 January, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Present: Mr.Sarju Puri vs Unknown on 30 January, 2009
            Crl.Misc. No.M- 34017 of 2008



Paramjit Kaur and another              vs.     State of Punjab


PRESENT: Mr.Sarju Puri,Advocate for the petitioners.
        Mr.Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG Punjab
              * * *


        At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 23.12.2008, the

following order was passed:-

                          "This petition has been filed under Section 438

         Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner(s) in case

         FIR No.174 dated 5.11.2008 lodged for commission of offence

         punishable under Section(s) 326, 323, 324, 149 IPC with Police

         Station, City, Nawanshahar.

                          Learned   counsel   contends   that    complainant,

         Charanjit Kaur, is none other but the mother of petitioner No.1,

         Paramjit Kaur. Initially, Charanjit Kaur had tried to poison her

         own son Bikram Singh whereupon FIR No.89 dated 29.6.2008

         (Annexure P-1) was registered under Section 307 IPC with Police

         Station, City, Nawanshahar. Now the present FIR has been

         lodged. While petitioner No.1 is alleged to have dragged the

         complainant backwards, petitioner No.2 is alleged to have given a

         stick blow on the left knee of the complainant. The injury on the

         left knee is simple.

                          Considering the relationship between the parties;

         Annexure P-1 i.e. FIR at the instance of son of the complainant;

         and the totality of facts and circumstances, issue notice of motion

         for 30.1.2009.
                            Crl.Misc. No. M-34017 of 2008               -2-



                           In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the

          petitioners will be released on interim anticipatory bail on

          furnishing     of   bail   bonds       to     the     satisfaction    of   the

          Arresting/Investigating      Officer        subject    to    the     following

          conditions:-

                      "(i) The petitioners shall make themselves
                      available for interrogation as and when required;

                      (ii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly
                      make any inducement, threat or promise to any
                      person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
                      to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the
                      Court or to any police officer; and

                      (iii) The petitioners shall not leave India without
                      the previous permission of the Court."


                 Leaned counsel for the State has submitted that the

petitioners have joined the investigation and are not required for further

investigation.

                 Accordingly, interim bail granted by this Court on

23.12.2008

is made absolute.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

( Sabina )
Judge

January 30, 2009

arya