IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 3992 of 2009(A)
1. V.K. BIJU, S/O. V.M. KURIEN,
... Petitioner
2. T.H. ABDULLA, S/O. HYDRU, AGED 29 YEARS
Vs
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED
... Respondent
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ISNTRUCTION
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
5. THE MANAGER, NAROKAVU HIGH
For Petitioner :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID
Dated :06/02/2009
O R D E R
HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.
----------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No. 3992 of 2009
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of February , 2009
JUDGMENT
Petitioners were appointed in the Narokavu High School
Kunnummel Potty, which is an aided school, as High School Assistants
( English). Ext.P1 and P2 are the appointment orders. The Educational
Officer declined approval to the appointments, stating that one protected
teacher should be appointed in the said school Ext.P3 and P4 orders are
passed by the District Educational officer.
2. Being aggrieved by the said orders the petitioners filed appeal
before the Deputy Director of Education, Malappuram/Appellate authority.
Ext.P3 and P4 orders are confirmed by the Appellate authority vide Ext.P5
and P6 orders.
3. Ext.P7 and P8 orders are the revisional orders passed by the
Director of Public Instructions, Thiruvananthapuram. The Revision
Authority also confirmed the appellate order. In effect the appointments of
the petitioners stands unapproved till date. Thereafter the Deputy
Director of Education, Malappuram intimated the petitioners that there are
no protected teachers in the District in the category of High School
Assistant (English).
4. The Manager of the said School has moved two separate
Revision petitions before the Government seeking approval of Ext.P1and
W.P.(C) No.3992 of 2009 -2-
P2 appointment orders. Ext.P13 and P14 are the revision petitions
pending before the Government. The only request of the counsel for the
petitioners is for a speedy disposal of Ext.P13 and .P14 Therefore a
direction is issued to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate
orders on Ext.P13 and P14 after affording an opportunity of being heard
to the affected parties.
The writ petition is disposed of as above. The matter shall be
decided by the 1st respondent within a period of three months from the
date of receipt of a copy of this judgment . The petitioners shall produce a
copy of the judgment and writ petition before 1st respondent.
(HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE)
es.
HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.
—————————
W.P.(C) 3992 of 2009
—————————-
JUDGMENT
6th February, 2009