High Court Kerala High Court

J.Sathyadevan vs State Of Kerala on 17 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
J.Sathyadevan vs State Of Kerala on 17 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25307 of 2004(K)


1. J.SATHYADEVAN, VEDACHANAZHIKAM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.RAGHAVAN

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :17/07/2008

 O R D E R
                  C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                  --------------------------------------------
                       W.P.C. NO. 25307 OF 2004
                  --------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 17th day of July, 2008

                                JUDGMENT

Petitioner joined as driver on daily wages in the service of the

second respondent, which is a Government agency. Even though

petitioner has been continuously in service for over 20 years, his

services are not regularised. W.P. is for direction to the respondents to

regularise his service as driver. Government Pleader submitted that

though post is a permanent post and District Collector recommended to

the Government for regularisation of petitioner’s service, Government

declined for the reason that daily wage employee cannot be regularised

because he has not undergone any selection process. Petitioner has

relied on Ext.P14 judgment of Division Bench of this Court

whereunder the Division Bench has confirmed the order of learned

single Judge ordering regularisation of service of a driver similarly

placed like the petitioner. It is conceded by Government Pleader that

SLP filed against the judgment of Division Bench is dismissed by the

Supreme Court. Petitioner is admittedly a qualified driver and that is

2

why he was taken on daily wage basis and he continued his service for

the last 20 years. In the circumstances, and following the judgment

Ext.P14, I allow the Writ Petition directing the respondents to

regularise the service of petitioner as driver without any delay and give

him all consequential benefits.

(C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge
kk

3