High Court Karnataka High Court

Srimathi vs Pradeep N Naik S/O Narsiah on 8 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Srimathi vs Pradeep N Naik S/O Narsiah on 8 December, 2008
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
 

EN THE BIGH COURT OF 

BAN GALORE

DATED THIS THE I}8T" my 012' ;;Eif:}mB£;R299$ 

THE Hozwnug MR. ,n;s'rz:::::%%x:wLu%2;«;::1.k;.;5m«.:::«:%:su%

Mzscanumsous  AP 1>::;§;L M.a.ms3o or

BETW'EEN: L     = %% 

Srima'£hi:.,    1
Vasar'n3;§.i1';j:Q'V_  ~ 7
AIii:ar..:- ' ' V
E\/iriiiizgfgznjafg.  _ _
 Rat'hi;-:gia;* -»   '-

* Kw' !'~' :~"'

Appséfiafits  1:; "C? fife

éiivlinors by théir next friend
._f_ *an.;1_n;o1her the?' 'appeilant.

_ " are aged about 38, 28, 18, 3. 5,

~.   I "a:is':_i-- .8  respectivefy; appeiiant No.1
A  is the? fiidexv and appefiants No.2 £0 6 are
" €136' ghiédren of £316 Mazzjimatha Acfzazya;

thazippeliants are residing in A1303; Véflage

A' 'T «@1341 post, Kundapura Tahik, District: Udupi.

' "(By Sri.Paxraz3a Chandra Shettj-9., Adv.)

W

...APPELI,ANTS



 

M}

D:

wmmmmmmg

1.

Pz’aéeep.N_Naik,

Sfo Narsiah,

Hausa “§\§’0.1O£’3(}i’l€}, __
Varkhandam {War}«:hande),
Fonda Goa.

National Inszzraszce C0}
Magjidda Mansiorz, L’ ‘

Above Dena B3121: ‘

Panda, Goa403’«–+”§01,

Reprezsemed by its Man’ag§%.:i9. K ‘

Raju _Z)a’£’§a:V1{:Ra§i§:shj §:;*€}xx*a$§}}{;fi%’,wv

Sfq Da§_ta1Ali§?cfwsk§ar; ..

C! 1} _Prgd§:ep E’-3

. —- $.59′ ~ V

Ho:;s=¢m::f;5,r;~;:m§, %
Vz1rkhand:ém.(WézrI;h’g;3de),

‘ ; (By. Sri..V;*’~’5g:R§}”L>V1’S}1;21?i'{11<:z;r, Adv.

'Pgfida, G03;-. _

for R-2)

iifikiifi

…RES?0NI)E?_"€TS

-This” M.F.A. is filed under Seczizrictm 173(1) of MV Act
~. “–..V%z1gV”a§§fz’st__tizéyjudgriaent and award dated ‘?.6.{}6 passsed in MVC
A NQYEZQQ2 0:: the file of the Civii Judge {SD} & Member Add}.

” MERCY, Kundapura, partly ailewing the claim petitiarz far

ézzmpensatioa am seeking enhancement of canawnsatigan.

This MBA. earning arm for erders. this the Court

‘ N de£ivere:d the f0}}0u;i3ag:-

M.

msganth as a Carpezzter and Boat buiider arid ihat he was y-‘m.mg
and ssmcrgetic and had eznployed 20 perscans under On the

claim pefiition filed the n1at’€er was c0nte3ted….Pfg* I§§5;zre’r.

Respmadezzts 1 and 3 were placed ..

pleaditzgs, the Tribunai ha~gi:1g}%{ta§s¢d’% ib r._ j

consideration afier enquizfs-*T’§2§}d thfitiie aa:c.§d€§;’:V§§sas gijuté ‘t:) {h€

negiigenea an the part Qf VV6ZL3:¥:’T:i”if’f.i’=.I: «sf Bearing NOGA

0} E 0279. Q3} vt’i*z.€ ‘ grfinmrj’ ifiifirfi is he cegeiat prmc-f

regarding th_c:’-i;3£o31j2e”i)i’7 iiafiseaafad ..;if’»’Rs.1S,OGQ5r’– per menth

per month by adapting the
apfifqpfiate’:zz_§i§§’pE§§:r«.%§ixérded 3 sum {if Rs.3,36,000,s”- towards

ii:->35 0f”4é1¢.-ifzendeziéy fizid R3.2O5QQ0!?- is awardézd iewyardg the

éé:i~§52ni’ia>;1a§ Being mttst satisified with the same, éhe

V , u€:§:;1Vi:i3i1V;si23f’s*’£:f¥;;.bezfiiwre this Cfliift seeking for mhan.<:e§§zent.

A. z 4. Heard.

37. It is the szlbmissitm Q? the: ieamed Cmzzasei finer i%::e

ap’pci}az3isfciain}ant3 that geveral exiaibits %”;av:: hem} prcacfmced is

W’

the efiect that the éeceased was; a boat bfiikier ané that he had
purchascé W805 fimr; variaus persmzs and aiihamgh receipts
were presaziuced ané aise certificates warts: aim pr(>£}:ié:cd as per

EXSPQ ti} E E ta prove ?;hat the éeeeaseé was Ffigfifiifiiig;fi*;r:QV”1’j:g)£1tS,

on the grmmd that fiw person wim has issaxefifiye’ a:.¢;’t§_f§;:$at::.¢ 1:332

:10? been examined, tbs incazime (}f fj.f;}i’c: Q;i e’c§:éiS;vt3d_ was’ xiii’; ]

beiieved” it is 33530 sub1I1%»i'{e_:,x7€7a’;9~f;i”:=AA Ai’:£;–g:: famiiy ought to haw:

btfezz g);:§,V’fi’:fi *3§igh_er V£§ide>. Accordingly, s;0ug%*s’i far

enhé,z;_c’c2}1efit._0§”-¢t’;2;if::<c:fi's;éii0n.

{§."«.Per~con.tra, the ieamw Cmmsci tbs" the inauraf has

3A11'E::§i'§~if€:¢a§;.T.V;i3*ié1i the amount awarded is just mad fair and discs. neat

°' req-:§i3*c:' i.nt5rfer¢nc<:.

3?. In the Eight {Trf Ehc: a:’g1zme3§’ts aclvanazed, ‘SE16 pazgxéazi that
wauid arise for cansidsratien is, svieeiiaer the ciaimanis are

enifitied fer azihaizcemficzzt izfcnmpezzsaifim’?

:9. Acmrdéngiy, appear} is aiiawed in par’:

Bkp.