High Court Kerala High Court

P.Mohanakrishnan vs The Deputy Tahsildar (R.R on 2 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
P.Mohanakrishnan vs The Deputy Tahsildar (R.R on 2 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34484 of 2009(E)


1. P.MOHANAKRISHNAN, S/O.KUNJUNNI MENON,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.0
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

3. STATE BANK OF INDIA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL

                For Respondent  :SRI.R.S.KALKURA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :02/02/2010

 O R D E R
                    P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
              ..............................................................................
                       W.P.(C) No. 34484 OF 2009
               .........................................................................
                      Dated this the 2nd February, 2010



                                    J U D G M E N T

The petitioner had availed a personal loan from the third

respondent Bank, which however could not be repaid on time. In

the said circumstance, the said respondent proceeded with

further steps to get it realized, invoking the machinery under

the Revenue Recovery Act, leading to issuance of Exts. P2 and P3

notices, which in turn are under challenge in this Writ Petition.

2. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank,

on instruction, and also with reference to the contents of the

statement filed before this Court today, submits that the

outstanding liability is only Rs.88763.99/- as on 31.12.2009.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

might be given some breathing time to wipe out the entire

liability by way of reasonable installments.

3. After considering the facts and circumstances, the

W.P.(C) No. 34484 OF 2009

2

petitioner is permitted to clear the liability by way of five equal

monthly installments, the first of which shall be effected on or

before the 25th of this month, to be followed by similar

installments to be effected on or before the 25th of the succeeding

months. Subject to the above, all further recovery proceedings

pursuant to Exts.P2 and P3 shall be kept in abeyance. It is also

made clear that if any default is committed in satisfying the

liability as above, the respondents will be at liberty to proceed

with further steps for realisation of the entire amount in a lump

sum from the stage where it stands now.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.

lk