High Court Kerala High Court

Sophiamma Joseph vs Philomina Chacko on 18 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sophiamma Joseph vs Philomina Chacko on 18 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 9069 of 2010(O)


1. SOPHIAMMA JOSEPH,AGED 61 YEARS,W/O.MAJOR
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. PHILOMINA CHACKO,AGED 84 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SILVIAMMA RAJI,AGED 56 YEARS,

3. SIBIKUTTY,W/O.THOMAS,AGED 51 YEARS,FROM

4. SINDHIAMMA GEORGE,AGED 61 YEARS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.MURALEEDHARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN

 Dated :18/03/2010

 O R D E R
                    P. BHAVADASAN, J.
            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
                 W.P.(C) No. 9069 of 2010
            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
          Dated this the 18th day of March, 2010

                         JUDGMENT

Limited prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to

the Sub Court, Kottarakkara to take up A.S. No.25 of 2008

pending before that court and dispose of the same within a

time frame.

2. Petitioner was the plaintiff in O.S. No.145 of 2005,

a suit for partition. The suit was decreed. Against the

judgment and decree the respondents/defendants filed an

appeal before the Sub Court, Kottarakkara as A.S. No.25 of

2008. The grievance of the petitioner is that due to the

pendency of the appeal, she has suffered irreparable injury

and hardship. It is pointed out that the respondents have

unnecessarily dragged on the suit under some pretext or

other. She, therefore, seeks a direction to the Sub Court,

Kottarakkara to dispose of the appeal within a specified

time.

W.P.(C) No. 9069/2010 2

3. In the light of the order that is sought to be

passed, notice to the respondents is not necessary.

4. Limited prayer is to dispose of the appeal at the

earliest. The Sub Court, Kottarakkara is a heavy court. The

petitioner, being a senior citizen, will have to be given

preference.

5. Therefore, there will be a direction to the Sub

Court, Kottarakkara to take up A.S. No.25 of 2008 at the

earliest and dispose of the same within six months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE.

mn.