High Court Karnataka High Court

Padmavathi B vs Tahsildar on 6 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Padmavathi B vs Tahsildar on 6 November, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
.u} 

WP 32290/O9

IN EHE HIGB COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED TEES THE 6" DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009Efiy*

BEFORE:

§HE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 5J1? J;GUNj$LE%'Q

WRIT PETITION No.3229O gg,

BETWEEN:

Padmavathi B., v
Aged about 76 years,
W/0. Narayana rai,
Belya House, . , E
Ajjavara Post and vil£age 5
Suilia Ialukyiy .'E .j; E
D.K.Bist:ic:45?4'233.'-=

{By M/s¢wS3fipata&;Vat3aia flaw Assets.

AND:

1. Tahsildar}
Suiié Xalukl-,V V
E__Dakshina,KannadawBistrict,
"y:fi Cdde5574 239.

2;»Revehuéa§n§peCtor,

Suila Hoblxg

Sulia ?e1fik,
. Dakshina Kannada District,
', Pin CQdé--574 239.

"Poiice Sub»Inspector,
Vsulia,
Sulia Taluk,

'"u.v$akshina Kannada District,

Pin Code--574 239.

{By Sri. N.B.Vishwanath, AGA.1

2§é§

iGM:R€s} "K

PEEITEONER/S

Advs.}

RESPONDENT/S

3 WP 32290/O9

(ii) The impugned complaint and charge sheet

filed in c.c. No.1s9/2009 for .the

offence punishable under Sectieuei92€Ai<

of the Karnataka Land Revenue hat, 196iiV

pending on the file of the Cifiil Jedge

{Jr. Dn.] and $MECi,: 7sfiiia,"¥np.g,T

District are hereby queshed. e;i

(iii) Liberty is resersedite the Stete or its
authorityKh,’tQ7fl”Keem§:y with the
requirement’ as, tenteepiated in the
circular VbefeteV=ihitietihgfi any action

ageihst the petitiQnef¢ if need arises.

(iv) Ali dehtentiehs eye left open.

Sri. N E}Vishwahath; learned AGA., is permitted

to file memo of appearance within four weeks.

Sd/-

JUDGE

K s.m*.. V’ ,. ..