High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Suraj Prakash Singh vs State Of Bihar on 27 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Suraj Prakash Singh vs State Of Bihar on 27 October, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.30395 of 2010
              SURAJ PRAKASH SINGH, SON OF SHRI SIPAHI SINGH @ SIPAHI
              MAHTO KUSHWAHA
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

4. 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 21 and 22 of N.D.P.S. Act.

It has been submitted that for recovery of 13 Kg. of

Ganja, the petitioner has remained in custody since 14.3.2010

and has fair antecedents.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, VII, Patna, Vide.

Spl. Case No. 07 of 2010 arising out of Patna Jn. Case No. 105

of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner, the 2nd bailor shall be the local and the 3rd bailor shall

be the father/mother/brother of the petitioner. The bailor will

undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change

in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly

state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and
2

if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall

also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the court

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation

of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali