High Court Kerala High Court

Ummusalma vs The Malappuram Municipality on 20 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
Ummusalma vs The Malappuram Municipality on 20 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 23110 of 2009(G)


1. UMMUSALMA,ARIPURAVAN PARAKKAL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. M.K.SAJNA,ARIPURAVAN PARAKKAL HOUSE,

                        Vs



1. THE MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY,REPRESENTED
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU S. NAIR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :20/08/2009

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                   W.P(C).No.23110 OF 2009
                  -------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 20th day of August, 2009


                              JUDGMENT

The petitioners’ application for building permit has been

rejected on the ground that there is a proposal to acquire their

property for widening of a road and also on ground referable to

the provision for 35 metres distance from the centre of the

adjoining highway. In the absence of any notification under

Section 18(2) of the Highway Protection Act, 1999, there cannot

be any insistence of the said distance rule. Equally, with no

notification having been made under the Land Acquisition Act for

acquiring the property, there cannot be any objection referable

to proposal to acquire land. Therefore, following the judgment

in Peer Muhammed v. Chirakkandam Grama Panchayat

[2008(3) KLT 300], it is ordered that in the absence of

notifications under the Land Acquisition Act and under Section

18(2) of the Highway Protection Act, 1999, the application of the

petitioners shall be considered and ordered without reference to

the grounds raised in Ext.P1. This shall be done after getting

WPC.23110/09

Page numbers

proper instructions from the PWD. To enable that process,

Ext.P1 is quashed. Let the needful be done within a period of 45

days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The

writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.

kkb.22/8.