High Court Patna High Court - Orders

M/S Parmatma Allied Feed Comp. vs The Bihar State Electricity Bo on 7 December, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
M/S Parmatma Allied Feed Comp. vs The Bihar State Electricity Bo on 7 December, 2010
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CWJC No.6791 of 2009
                     M/S PARMATMA ALLIED FEED COMPANY PVT. LTD.
                                      Versus
                      THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
                                   -----------

3/ 07/12/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned counsel for the State.

The dispute in this writ application pertains to

the power factor surcharge levied by the respondent

Board upon the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits from

paragraph-4 of the terms and conditions of H.T. Tariff

that the petitioner is a H.T.S.-1(11 K.V.A.) 6.6 Kilo Watt

category consumer. The power factor surcharge has been

specified in two different categories depending on the

nature of the consumption pattern. The bills raised with

regard to the power factor surcharge are contrary to the

same.

The petitioner represented against his bill to

that extent. Without disposing his representation he was

threatened with disconnection which compelled the

petitioner to file this application. The petitioner has no

objection to moving the Consumer Grievances Redressal

Forum (hereinafter referred to as C.G.R.F.) under

Section-42(5)of the Electricity Act, 2003. He submits that

the relief sought is confined only to the quantum of the
-2-

bill insofar as the power factor surcharge is concerned,

and that the petitioner is willing to pay all other charges

as may be raised in the current bills and in future based

on user.

Learned counsel for the Board submits that the

petitioner may avail his remedies appropriately before the

C.G.R.F.

The Court is satisfied that the Forum shall be a

better authority to investigate into technical question of

fact only whereafter the need for judicial review may or

may not arise.

The interim order dated 2..6.2009 is modified to

the extent that the petitioner shall pay all charges in the

impugned bill dated 15.5.2009 except as levied for power

factor surcharge being the disputed amount. The

petitioner shall continue to pay his current bills except

for the power factor surcharge issue which shall abide by

the decision of the C.G.R.F.

Only if the petitioner files an application before

the C.G.R.F. within thirty days from today, let the same

be considered and disposed off by a reasoned and

speaking order in accordance with law within a

maximum period of two months from the date of

receipt/presentation of the representation along with a

copy of this order. If the petitioner does not file an
-3-

application before the C.G.R.F. within the time indicated,

the claim with regard to power factor surcharge shall be

deemed to have been rejected when the Board shall be at

liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

The writ application stands disposed.

KC                              ( Navin Sinha, J.)