High Court Kerala High Court

Shahul Hameed vs Vijayan on 13 January, 2009

Kerala High Court
Shahul Hameed vs Vijayan on 13 January, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1000 of 2008()


1. SHAHUL HAMEED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. VIJAYAN, AGED 28 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. K.K.ABDUL RAHIM,

3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :SMT.T.C.SOWMIAVATHY

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :13/01/2009

 O R D E R
                         M.N. KRISHNAN, J
                         -----------------------
                    M.A.C.A.No. 1000 OF 2008
                    ---------------------------------
              Dated this the 13th day of January, 2009


                              JUDGMENT

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Principal

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode in O.P.(MV)

No.273/2000. The claimant, a 15 year old boy, sustained injuries in

a road accident and he has been awarded a compensation of

Rs. 6,500/-. The claimant has come up in appeal for enhancement.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the

Insurance Company. The learned counsel for the appellant had

produced before me the reference card issued by Medical College

Hospital, Kozhikode. It would show that he was admitted on

14.12.98 and discharged on 18.12.98. He had a fracture of the

tibia with minimal displacement. It is also seen that plaster cast

was applied and it was there till 4.3.99 and on 24.6.99 advice was

given for continuing to mobilise of knee. So it is seen that the boy

had pain and suffering and leg was under plaster cast for a

considerable length of time. The compensation awarded appears to

be grossly inadequate. At the age of 15, the boy had sustained a

fracture of the tibia with displacement and his leg was under plaster

M.A.C.A.No. 1000/2008
-2-

cast for more than 3-4 months. He would not have been in a

position to enjoy or play during the period and certainly a fracture

on the leg would affect the mobility of the person. When such a

prolonged treatment is undergone, it will cause lot of pain and

suffering. So taking into consideration these aspects I enhance the

compensation for pain and suffering by Rs. 7,000/- and loss of

amenities and enjoyment by Rs. 5,000/-, making an additional

compensation of Rs. 12,000/-.

Therefore the M.A.C.A is partly allowed and the claimant is

awarded an additional compensation of Rs. 12,000/- with 7%

interest on the said sum from the date of petition till realisation.

The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the same within a

period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment.

M.N. KRISHNAN,JUDGE

vkm