CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,
Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.
Tel: +91-11-26161796
Decision No.CIC/SG/A/2009/002956/6296
Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2009/002956
Appellant : Mr. Tarun K. Roy
3/3A, Street No.5
K-Block, Gangotri Vihar,
Delhi-110053
Respondent : Mr. Jay Chanda
Public Information Officer &
Assistant Registrar,
University of Delhi,
Main Campus, Delhi-110007
RTI application filed on : 02/09/2009
PIO replied : 29/10/2009 & 05/10/2009
First Appeal filed on : 14/10/2009
First Appellate Authority order : Not mentioned.
Second Appeal Received on : 20/11/2009
Information sought:
1. (a) Photocopy of the original application submitted by Prof. C.R. Babu to be considered as Professor
for open post/ direct post in the Dept of Botany, University of Delhi(including photocopy of all
attachments with the original application)
(c) Photocopy of the original application submitted by Prof. C. R. Babu to be consider for the post of
Professor under Merit Promotion Scheme in the Dept of Botany, DU (including photocopy of all
attachments with the original application)
(d) Photocopy of the appointment letter issued by the University of Delhi to Prof. C. R. Babu for the
post of Professor:
(i) in open category/ direct category
(ii) under Merit Promotion Scheme
(e) Photocopy of joining report of Prof. C. R. Babu as Professor in the Dept of Botany, University of
Delhi:
(i) under Merit Promotion Scheme
(ii) in open category/ direct category
3. (a) The complete list of the Teaching Faculty/ visiting Faculty (in chronological order)
appointed in the Dept of Environmental Biology to take classes of M.Sc students in the subject
environmental biology from 1991 till date as per Table-1
S.No Name of Teaching Faculty/ Year of appointment the Name of the Honorarium/
Visiting Faculty with Teaching/ Visiting Coordinator of emoluments/
designation & attached with Faculty the Dept. of conveyance expenses
name of dept/ institution/ Environmental pad to the faculty
organization. Biology
4.(a)(vi)Name of the officer/ authority who authorize additional officer/ person to accompany &
assist the PIO/ authority who authorize additional officer/ person to accompany & assist the PIO to
attend in the CIC hearing(s)
PIO's Reply:
The information sought by the Appellant was referred to the Establishment Wing, Dy. Finance Officer
and Project In-charge, Biodiversity Parks Programmee. Input received from them was enclosed.(no copy
in file)
Appellant may inspect the relevant file for any information with respect to Sl.No. 1 & 3(a) of the Original
Application except 1 (b) for which specific information was provided, with the Assistant Registrar
(Estab.T) and Head, Deptt. of Environmental Biology, University of Delhi, Delhi-7 at a mutually
convenient date and time on given telephone number before 16/10/2009.
The Appellant may inspect relevant files with respect to Sl.No2 of the Original Application on18/10/2009
and 09/10/2009 at the Central Information Commission as all the relevant files would be opened up by the
Biodiversity Parks Programme as per order of CIC No. CIC/SG/A/2009/001841/4861 date 18/09/2009
Replied vide letter dated 05/10/2009:
Information provided by the Dy. Registrar (Legal) of the University was enclosed. There was no specific
number of days as regards Sl. No. 4(a)(i). Information sought by the Appellant with respect to Sl.No. 4 (a)
(i) to 4(a)(v) was not a request for information as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act. As regards Sl.No
4(a) (vi), deemed PIOs or their representatives who were conversant with the subject matter accompany
the PIO as per instruction of the CIC.
Grounds for First Appeal:
Appellant requested for complete information to sub-paras (a), (c), (d) & (e) of Para 1.
Information to Para 3(a), sub-para (vi) of Para 4(a) were not provided.
Order of the First Appellate Authority:
Not enclosed.
Grounds for Second Appeal:
Incomplete information.
Relevant Facts
emerging during Hearing:
The following were present
Appellant: Mr. Tarun K. Roy;
Respondent: Mr. Jay Chanda, Public Information Officer & Assistant Registrar;
The PIO has given the information to the Appellant. The Appellant claims that the information is
wrong without giving any evidence of this. The Commission cannot accept mere allegation of information
being false.
Decision:
The appeal is dismissed.
The information has been provided.
This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI
Act.
Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
06 January 2010
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)Rnj