High Court Kerala High Court

Subhash vs The State Of Kerala-Represented … on 6 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
Subhash vs The State Of Kerala-Represented … on 6 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 15542 of 2008(A)


1. SUBHASH, AGED 48 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD.,

3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR),

4. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ALAN PAPALI

                For Respondent  :SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC, K.S.F.E. LTD.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :06/06/2008

 O R D E R
                          ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

                = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                = =W.P.(C) = = = = = = = = = = = =
                            No. 15542 OF 2008 A
                      = = =

                      Dated this the 6th June 2008

                            J U D G M E N T

Petitioner who was a surety in three chitties is facing recovery

proceedings. According to the petitioner, no amount is due and

therefore he submitted Ext. P3 to the 3rd respondent for a statement

regarding the total amount due in respect of the three chitties to

which he was the surety. In this writ petition what is essentially

sought for by the petitioner is that he should know the exact

amount that is due, he should be issued a statement of accounts.

2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd

respondent. He submits that if the petitioner approaches the

Manager of Branch II, Trivandrum, the statement of accounts will be

furnished to the petitioner indicating his liability. In view of this,

directing that it will be open to the petitioner to approach the

Manager of Branch II, Trivandrum, requesting for a copy of the

statement of account, in which case, the same shall be furnished,

this writ petition is disposed of.

W.P.(C) No. 15542 OF 2008

-2-

3. Petitioner also submits that in case if any liability is found

to be due, he should be given the benefit of the one time settlement

scheme. Taking into account the submission, it is directed that it

will be open to the petitioner to approach the concerned officer of

the 2nd respondent for the benefit of one time settlement.

ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
jan/-