Rajaiyada Khatoon vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors. on 16 September, 2010

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   MJC No.1041 of 2010
                    RAJAIYADA KHATOON, W/O LATE MD. HUSNAIN
                   ANSARI, R/O VILLAGE - BATHUA BALITOLA, P.S -
                   MANJNAGARH, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ.
                                       Versus
                   1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH (MR. ANJANI
                   KUMAR SINGH SON OF NOT KNOWN) THE
                   PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES
                   DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
                   2.   MR.   ASHUTOSH,     DIRECTOR   PRIMARY
                   EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. SON OF NOT KNOWN,
                   3. MR. RAJESH DAMIYAN KUJUER,REGIONAL
                   DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, CHAPRA.
                   SON OF NOT KNOWN.
                   4. MR. KULDIP NARAYAN , THE DISTRICT
                   MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ. SON OF NOT KNOWN.
                   5. MR.MADAN MOHAN PRASAD , THE DIRECTOR
                   PROVIDENT FUND , BIHAR, PATNA. SON OF NOT
                   KNOWN.
                   6. MR. RAKESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY,THE
                   DISTRICT         SUPERINTENDENT          OF
                   EDUCATION,GOPALGANJ. SON OF NOT KNOWN.
                   7. MR. ABHAY KUMAR,THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT
                   FUND OFFICER, GOPALGANJ. SON OF NOT
                   KNOWN.
                   8. MR. AJAY KUMAR SINGH, THE RANGE OFFICER
                   OF EDUCATION, BARAULI, GOPALGANJ. SON OF
                   NOT KNOWN.
                   9. MR. NAGENDRA CHAUDHARY,THE TREASURY
                   OFFICER, GOPALGANJ. SON OF NOT KNOWN.
                   10. MR. ABUL HASAN ANSARI, THE HEADMASTER,
                   UPGRADE MIDDLE SCHOOL, MAHAMADPUR,
                   BARAULI, GOPALGANJ. SON OF NOT KNOWN.
                                         -----------

02. 16.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner files a slip

stating therein to the effect that the order has been complied

with and as such, this contempt application need not proceed

further.

In view of the above, since the order has been

complied with, this contempt application need not proceed

further and the same stands disposed of.

Jagdish/                                ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)