Smt Shantha Rathnakar vs The Regional Transport Authority on 27 August, 2008

IN THE HIGH comm' 0? KARNATAKA, BANGAL,§;RE

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUS7E«~~2§}f$$_ ' 

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE  
WRET PETITION NQ.:1§5175' 2oo7£M%v;'%   k

BETWEEN

SMT. SHANTHA RA'I'EiI}?s'AKA'i~"i,_ 

w/0. IVLK. RATHNAKA'R,- ,  
AGED ABOUT 55   % ALA",   ; _ 
DHANASHALA.I€OAD ,  ~ «k =

DAKSHINA'VEf{AI§1?§§ADA,«   4  %   PETITIONER.
(By Sfi: As'.  ADV.)

ANA; %

 "  . v:RE{}IO§fAL"'I'RANSPORT

' - A AUT1_'HQR E'Y, UDUPI, D.K.

L' i?L" TH"E :é'E.C1§E;I'ARY,

« ex;

' ._REG.IQ1~{AL TRANSPORT
AUFHORHY, UDUPI, D.K.

;»3RI. JEEVANDAS ADHYANPHAYA,

 S:/0. LATE N.S. ADHYANTHAYA,
SIDDU SADANA, NEAR GOVERNMENT
HOSPITAL, KARKALA TALUK,

UDUPI DISTRICT. . .. RESPONDENTS.

(SMT. NAGASHREE M.C. HCGP FOR R1 & R2,
SR1. ME. NAGESH, ADV. FOR R-3) F K
Y”

assimment of timings by the RTA. The petfiioner

having instituted the Revision petitions, it fivcirj

him to ensure that those petitions are bf t}a_t% tins’

earliest and it is needless to

the permit Axmexure-“N”V,;31ust Writ

Without merit and is accordixxgiy, d_ismis.sg_éd;’:

KS