~ ~ ;{:~3y' S131: P S"R{¥JAGOPAL ASSOCIATES )
IN THE HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA AT T'
DATED THIS THE 10th SAY 0:sfJ§i»'<) i§«*1::2_sA'B;.§',2?'AA
PRESENT 1 n n\'V
THE H€)N'13LE MR. 9.9. DIN}5§"£;{:AI§fAN;.
4' ANfD.. ,_ ,.
THE HON'BLE MR:Ji}QfICE V.G.SA B'HAHIT
:X&"§§I'f'.APiF§EA§IQ;P€O«. V2038
BETWEEN: " ' " "
1 THARIAN"'C--HAj-CK(}f:.; " _ .
s/0 LATE :9 C:*«.f*:¥~IAcI<é:, . '
AG«E:58.YEARS, " Q" % _ _
EARLIER w0RKzr_¢G..As G.FFiCER IN
NHDDLE MA_NAGEMENT<...
GRADE SCALE,-Hi-IN '
ANm;1RA'BANK" .....
-SINCE ;LLEGALLY DISMISSED
»FRO_M .SER'e.f1(§E AND
" Ri_A.'Ar;3;«G21GAN.MANOR,
DENNUR NAGAR,
BAHGALQRLE-«S69 032. ...APPELLANT
'5fjA1s:D«:'_ .
-.1, V' ANDREA BANK
--. ' BODY CONSTITUTED
UNDER THE BANKING
COMPANIES'(ACQU£SITIDi\I
for fresh eonsidexation of the appeal in .
in the light of the observations ma1;iein '4 '*
order and directed the appellate AA
appeal as expeditiously ae possible " in 'ueesfeezt jjnet ;
later than three months fmm of ofgcopy of
the order. A 'A ' 2 H H
2. The apV1pe31an:A,,_1a ¢rci:.i__' 1:;1ed'~-.§g'.~ié,No.21647/2001
seeking for of by the Appeflate
Authofifiij dated' the order passed by
the 21.10.2000 and for a
_ diIec*.ipi1e'to reijzetate fhe petitioner into the service 01"
with continuity of service and ed}
including the monetary 'Benefits.
3: is the contention of the whit petifioner that he was
A as Ofieer Gradedll in Vijaya Bank fmm 1.2323 to
Thereafler eetitioner joined the first respondent»
Bank as an Oficer in Grade}! on 10.18.78 with
efieet from 1.1.83. Andhra Bank Gfiem (Service
x99»
appellate authority shafl carefully consider .’
involved in the case when an order of b
dismissal fiom service has beegfi
petitioner and accordingly! the? pcfitiééi. Scftiiig ‘V L»
aside the order passed by éatcd
12.4.2001 and Itmittcsii -age .%.&fiesi{%d:sg§osa1 in
accordance with law in made in
the course Singlé Judge and
di1:’3ctc<IV.' fli,é of the appeal as
cxpcdificgtlsij as — any event not later than
three mgnthfi of receipt of copy of this order.
" 'sa 1d' order dated 21.7.2008, the writ;
' petitioner. this appeal.
‘A heard the learned counsel appearm g for
appenann
V’ * Learned counsei appearing for the appeflant
gtfinmitteci that the learned Single Judge was not justified in
mmitting the matter to the appellate autlzxoxity. The material
on record would clearly show that the charg§:s'” V.
against the appellant had not been proved as r1gl’ it
the Inquiry Officer and the ord,éi5 bf fltltc .;
Authority reversing the finding of
baseless and the appellate »}:1as.Vi1<;st
while disposing of the' 'the7§1ca;r'nf:d
Single Judge ought to haéiclget asiiig passed by the
Ibisciplinaxy Auggofity by charges frameé
against the the Disciphn' ary
Authority 'h:::}d by the Inquiry Omcer.
_ 7'. . 'have Vnigivfzit amcious oonsisiemtion to the
cfinteiafioxi of counsel appearing for the aypellant
and on record including the order
VV'.;« %ia§$sed théi ' g Authority, i)iscipl1na1y' authority
appellate authority.
‘ The perusal of the material on mccrti would clearly
” that thqugh the Incfuiring Authority had mcorfieci a
finding that charges have not been prevail, the Disciplinary
Q
\9«)>
10
call for interference in this appeal. Accordingly, V.
there is no merit in this appeal and pass the M
The Writ appeal is dismissed.
” Justice
% Judge