High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Ishwar Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Ishwar Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.27539 of 2010
                  RAM ISHWAR YADAV SON OF LATE DHANESHWAR YADAV
                                            Versus
                                     STATE OF BIHAR
                                          -----------

2. 16.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Section 3 of the R.P. (U.P.) Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody since

9.6.2010 and there is no other case of similar nature pending

against him, which fact will be verified by the Magistrate concerned

before releasing the petitioner on bail, let the petitioner above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-

(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with

R.P.F. Post Jehanabad P.S.case No.1 of 2010, subject to the

conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of the

petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will

inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any

other case of similar nature after his release in the present case

and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that

the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge
-2-

and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in

any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Narendra/