Aaminkhan vs Unknown on 16 June, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/5909/2010	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 5909 of 2010
 

In


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION (STAMP NUMBER) No. 3003 of 2009
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2715 of 2009
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
 
 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================


 

AAMINKHAN
ALIKHAN PATHAN - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MS
PRITI PANDYA for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR NIRAJ SONI, AGP for Opponent(s) :
1, 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

Date
: 16/06/2010 

 

 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

1. RULE.

Shri Niraj Soni, learned AGP waives service of notice of rule on
behalf of the opponents.

2. The
present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been
preferred by the applicant-original petitioner to condone the delay
of 159/162 days caused in preferring the Miscellaneous Civil
Application in Special Civil Application No. 2715/2009.

3. Having
heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective
parties, the delay caused in preferring the Miscellaneous Civil
Application is hereby condoned.

4. With
this, the present application is allowed. Rule is made absolute
accordingly.

(M.R.

SHAH, J.)

siji

Top