Fidahusein vs Shardaben on 19 November, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CRA/1148/1999	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
REVISION APPLICATION No. 1148 of 1999
 

 
=========================================================

 

FIDAHUSEIN
MAHMEDALI BALDIWALA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

SHARDABEN
WD/O JAYANTILAL GANGARAM & 7 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
KV SHELAT for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
None for Opponent(s) : 1, 1.2.1,3 - 4,
4.3.2,4.3.3  
RULE SERVED for Opponent(s) : 1.2.2,1.2.3  
MR DC
DAVE for Opponent(s) : 1.3.1, 1.3.2,1.3.3 - 2, 2.2.1,2.2.2 - 3,
3.2.2,3.2.3 - 4, 4.2.2, 4.2.3,4.2.4 - 8. 
- for Opponent(s) : 0.0.0
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 19/11/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

Rule
remained unserved for respondent No.4/2/1 and rule is not received
back for respondent No.1 in CRA No.1408 of 1999. Notice of rule is
not received/served to respondent No.4/2/1 because of incomplete
address. Therefore, due to aforesaid office objection, matter is
listed before this Court to pass necessary order. Matter is of 1999.
No effective steps have been taken by petitioner though about more
than ten years have been over.

In
view of above, let petitioner may remove office objection, if any, on
or before 10 th
December 2010,
failing which, matter will stand dismissed in default without
reference to this Court.

[H.K.

RATHOD, J.]

#Dave

Top