M Nanjundappa S/O Lt Munibyrappa vs The Managing Driector on 29 October, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OE KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THIS THE 29m DAY OE OCTQ.EEE., 250?' T4    A 

BEFORE'

THE HON'B3;.E MR. 1UsT:£:E-EN.*NAGAMQHANA DAS A E

W.P.No.2,5Q96-1.03,32'QO9(€§M§KEB) 

BETWEEN:
3, M.NANyU1\rDJ'A.EEA _ _

AGED ABQ.UT'-S5      . 
S/O LATE Nfi;Nf.BYRAEPA"--A.'.'jvvA. "  
R/A N<3';32;'3,5§?"   '
v.v.NAGA_E,VAEA1§rEHAEUEA-- I
BANGALORE--56() (}6}..  - 

2. EALAKR:.sHNAVIfJA1~I_3:U'
AGED" ABOUT EQYEAES

 "  _ S/C)"SR:--.EAMANA1DU'*"

  ":5, 'Smf; }AE'1"AEA_1:sHM1
'BAIAKRISHNA NAIDU

AGED A~BQiE.?1' 38 YEARS

 ,EQ'1"I%i A;§'<E R/A NOJ2 TO 37,
~ }9""""..CROSS, 24'1"" MAIN,
 5  PHASE,' ].P.N'AGAR

.§3AN'GAfI.ORE--560 0'78.

. .PETITIONERS
(By Sri.V.V§SVVANATH, ADV.)

d\x-/'~«



AND:

1 _ THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

THE BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY
COMPANY LIMITED,

K_R.CIRCLE,   
BANGALORE-560 003. I

2. THE ASST. EXECIJTIVE ENc;mé_:ER (E). _ 
s--~5 SUB~DI\/ISION  ..
BESCOM,

15110 LAYOUT BRANCH 
BANGALOR_Ew56O 078. ' " --.  'A t 
 " .  __I¥.:ESPONDENTS

These v'.Vatr ;1t'jjetitiotiso._:fi1e'§i finder Articles 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of IvndiaA"p_ria"e}riVir1'g" to quash the endorsement dated
17.O8_.2009Lis.suedV  the Second respondent.

"  These petAiVt'io.z.as coming on for preliminary hearing B group

   daj'r,:'the"eourt made the following;

ORDER

Pvetittooer claiming to be the owner of Sy.No.32./3

Ameeuasufinsg 1 Acre S 31% guntas of Vasantapura Village, Bangaiore

OLV”

1,;

South Taluk now within the jurisdiction of Bruhath. fiangalore

Mahanagara Palike obtained power connection’

Subsequently, the respondents received.cornplaints~iI.stating&. that’

petitioner has obtained the power connection _-vproducing’–fakeVV

and fraudulent documents. Consequently, the respondents issued

a notice to the petitionieirjas to Vtiieppowepr connection should
not be disconnected. In issued by the
respondents. and also produced
certain” providing an opportunity to the
petitioner, the have. now passed the impugned order

to disconne'(.t._,ithepowerl supply to the petitioner. Learned

V’ «cgoVL1:1se’l’i £’or*._the petitioner submits that all the documents

._ lifoducedi’ the etitioner are not considered b the res ondents;
I? . ._ Y P Y P

further”, the petitioner requests for providing one more

” iiaopportunity to produce additional documents. In the

idircurristarices, one more opportunity is to be provided to the

petitioner. For the reasons stated above, the following:

d_ \/fxxx,

Mfi<% "big

iii)

iv)

ORDER
Writ petitions are hereby allowed.
The impugned order dated 17.8.2089

Annexure~K is hereby set–aside.

The matter is remitted tothe psecond4ir’es.pondent for ‘

fresh disposal in aecordaneeiflrith lain-v_aiter proirlidiingu

an opportunity to tEie._petitione’r, e
The petitioner to t.he«.additional documents

~ –.pA.Aé;1d loihjections if é’i’i;y;’%}vithin two weeks from the
«. date :_reee«ipt”of..::opy of this order.
‘1″.’_he’ respondents shall not disconnect power supply

“to the property of the petitioner till an appropriate

‘w . __ order is passed.

Sdl:

I115.’-39