Vajarappa N vs The Managing Director on 8 September, 2008

--- - '- ~ -- - -W-~ - -v" \-vvm Ur NIRNHIRKR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OFZKARNATAKA I-HG!-I 

W

tgisyhans %aath 3: §§TC, Shivaginagar Busw

atanfi amé ha :3 rafiming tha aama aa per fiha

texms amé m&mditi$ma afi the gxaat maéafinfhié;

fav¢a£. fhereaftarg ha 3abmi$tafi.'&hi$

zaprafigntatiam ta tbs :$ammi£siahér'*"¢ngT

,,u

E$.§:,2EaE" Eamg has Egan £§fiEififi$a& 8fld tfie

ammmnigatifin has been iéagafiu 5n" §i:fié§20G8
vifie &finsxaxe-Q. ?E§fi~$a%éitfi&@fin§cat$a§ had
bafifi. afifre35e&_ t$ w th&  §iE§§l§}Eespcndent
z$£amwenfiing §§¢§%a§:fié:fit§éli§§:§3entatian at
tkfl §etiti%m§§ §% %;§%§§%§ii%nvgrmunda having
xggamfi fig; §€%fj§£fi%%:£3}'j&%fi Lhia hackgraunfi

and qaaiiEi¢at£@.;f§éi%h§r tka Ieayandents 1

amd §:&fiWg Cflfifiifiéféd tha said re§ra3entatian

a §§$,tim$°h§§,bee§ fixtanfied fax the cantinuity

&fi~:érfinfi:n§:?wtalaphana bagth at BEES,

V £&i¥&§ifi5¥fit7 B38-stanfi. Eha tima has baan
"w $x£%gfia%* t$ fififitifififi £3 zeayeat ef Que
'$$2;EaE§. Efiflfiég tfia géaééiamar has presented

_§fifi in$t&fi$ fixit Eetitiam E93 the appzagziata

' féliQf$*

gang. .._...v -



E
8
I
E"
E

.....n...-. - nun \.UUlIl OEJKAHNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (3: KARNATAKA I-IGH COURT G KAR

 

request of the petitioner cannot be consideted
and the submission made by the learned ccungeliua

fer thr uetitianer cannet be acce tee unless "

and until they take deciaion agd;pasé'Qtde;e__

in accordance with law and pteyed f3i.tejedtO

the prayer sought by the petitioner, *7

7. Heating in viefi_the;put§Qse_for which
the licence is» granted 'tatticfileriy to the

persona whe_ are ;ape:iaily'fhan&icapped, the

respendents._fcafifi0t'",keep"""the petitioner's
request in"ebeyefice'yit§gut passing.any order
and it is net at all jaétifiable.

~i,_§C fgétefiore, keeping' in view' all this

aépectai"ef{ the matter, the instant Writ

OiDetitien.3ta$ds disposed of with the following
'O'5fiiiectien9E
ii kéetitiener is permitted to submit his

'H*~~fletailed representation-cum-application to

the respondents within ene week from

todav.

fl
mi
3!

i»«3

ha zaspanfignt ~ Saryaratian ia fiiractaé

if?’
<3

Cflfifiififii and diagéae af the _$fii§

zaprasantatian in acmorfianca wiEE"Ci§$; '_
within twfi weeka fzm tha date cf zeCei§t_ "

$5 t"@ ragrefiantatian by,§hfij§efii&i¢néf:_"q~

firésred ac¢nx£ingly; }a_ ;. , ;u7TMm$
wM_ A §hj/.

Judge

nm:s2,«’1.§,a. 1:5, 39; #3518.’ ‘

O3 ‘f\I’fII~ILI\.l\.l’\I up-A ..-._.. _. –