Smt Deepashri Tantry vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 July, 2009

complianoe with Government order dated

Annexure---"'C" and 26»-10-2007  '-.1:  u  

2. The petition is  'of,

objections dated 24--O2»2€)O§"'ir1ter  that 

Rule 9~A(a) of the  fllomlent
Regulations, 1983    provides for
disposal of 'of  public auction
and that   fiouses, 10 houses have
been Zpiito'  éoction in the notification

ixnpughecii, V

  There  dispute that Rule 9--A(a) of the

  the respondent -- Housing Board

“i.i:’fi”_v;f”or~T§;;’zii1ct:ion sale, 40% of the stray houses. In

V . the.°’insisrii’ Vcase, the statement of objections discloses

H ‘A of 26 stmy houses, oonstitutes 10 houses

.’ have been put up for public auction in the

[ ” notification. In that View of the matter, no

exception can be taken to the action of the Karnataka

M