High Court Karnataka High Court

Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 July, 2008
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
In Tm; men comer or KARNATAHA

cmcurr amen AT gananwsgp " f  »' '

DATED THIS THE 218'? BAx?1«Q§. JUVLYT '2do8.. . " A

BEFO1§E,. V
THE HONBLE MR. .JUS'IfIC--F§fS. P;»BDUL"NAZE{3§'R

WRIT PETIT§€)N""N{).~1.7"?(3{'1[25$???uf§}M-RES}

Shrew: Rtmulita "Ltd.",Cj '  
Having it$V__Regisfc1"e'::;I_ OJEESC':-:_ V' "

At No.BC-- 105,.. Haviciétk Road, _
Cautonigtenn Béig-:u:a_m~--»  1,

Reptd.  its  (caxffmmte Afiairs)
Ramesh Patil. -   ..   PETITIONER

(By Suit; Sindixu  Potéidar, Adv. for Prabhuling

 .I:{3N§:§fad,Agi,Adv;}v-- ---------- 

Z  1  of Karnataka,

By its Secretary,
x T Depi. of Commence 63 Industries,
1  Soudha, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhsi,
"  Eiiangalore --~ 560 001.

   2  The Commissioner of Cane Development

And Director of Sugar in Kamataka,
Chougule House, No.32,
Crescent Road, Bangalore -1. .. RESPONDENTS

(By Sré. 31.13. Adhyapak, AGA)

This writ petition is filed under’A.V ._
the Constitution of indie ;3rayir;.g_to d.i3ieot’ R1 te”g1f;mt _expori Q * ”

Osubsidy to the petitioner, etc. —

This writ petition ” V’ Hearing
this day, the Court made~–..t1jI;e_fc-11org§ing–:.._’2. _

.§¥§..Q_E:r;E.€I1tati0I1, the petitioner has filed this Writ

‘-petitiozfi .seel<ing the following reliefs:

' " Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or
V' other writ or direction, directing the 1*"
responcinet herein to grant export subsidy to the
petitioner to the tune of Rs.81.08 iakhs as
requested by the petitioner in its last of their

1:

3

representation dated 25*’! February 200′?

A1mexure–G and as per the Iecommendéitionj ~

made by the 29¢’ respondent Vida»
communicafions dated 9.6.2094,

14.07.2004 vide Annexures°–B_,”«._dé:d and ”

respectively;

ii) Grant such other end… reiief .3
this Hon’b1e CouI’t”~.de€_I1Ik$ i11.V;tlA1:e~ facts and

circumstances of easevi_n{;1udi1§ig’ order as

to costs.”:..

2. clearly discloses that the

petitioner l:te{s_Vi%’fiedVtl1eAa3,fo:7e:§aid representation. There is no

¢_mate1i;alVoi1 1eco1ii’eyidencing the considercation of the said

1-e{3;3Vresen.t_ation;A”‘I of the View that the 1′” respondent has

to’eonsix;te1″d.tneVA:aifoIesaid. representation at an early date.

.-__”In~.t’he Iesult, the writ petition succeeds and it is

aiiowed in part. I direct the 13’ respondent to

consfier the representation at Am1exnre~G dated 25.02.2007

‘ ‘E-aéCOI’daflC€ with law within a period of three months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This oxder should

k

4L

not be censtrued as expressing any opinion on

the matter. No costs.

CS