Gujarat High Court High Court

Dinesh vs State on 15 April, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Dinesh vs State on 15 April, 2010
Author: A.L.Dave,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Bankim.N.Mehta,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/2624/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 2624 of 2010
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1268 of 2006
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

DINESH
SANGRAMBHAI KHATANA THRO' KAILASH D KHATANA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
JAYSHREE C BHATT for
Applicant(s) : 1,MRMPSHAH for Applicant(s) : 1,MS. KRUTI M SHAH for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR HH PARIKH, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BANKIM.N.MEHTA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 15/04/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)

The
applicant seeks temporary bail for prisoner Dinesh Sangrambhai
Khatana on ground that she is required to pay Rs.30000/- towards
revenue dues being the amount of surety that she stood for co-accused
Sanjay Kundalik Kher, who is absconded.

On
inquiry being made, the notice produced along with the application is
reported to be genuine. However, the jail report indicates that the
conduct of the applicant is not good. He has been convicted for jail
offences on six different occasions, mainly involving the applicant
in fight with co-convicts and co-prisoners. The conduct of the
applicant appears to have compelled the jail authorities to send him
to Special Prison at Bhuj Kachchh.

At
this stage, realizing that the Court is not inclined to grant bail,
learned advocate Ms. Bhatt seeks permission to withdraw the
application.

Permission,
as prayed for is granted. The application is rejected as withdrawn.
Notice is discharged.

(A.L.

DAVE, J.)

(BANKIM.N.MEHTA,
J.)

shekhar/-

   

Top