High Court Kerala High Court

K.M.Yousef vs State Of Kerala on 16 January, 2007

Kerala High Court
K.M.Yousef vs State Of Kerala on 16 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 1588 of 2007(L)


1. K.M.YOUSEF, AGED 54 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER,

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.TPM.IBRAHIM KHAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

 Dated :16/01/2007

 O R D E R
                                   K.K.DENESAN, J

                            -------------------------------

                             W.P.(C)NO. 1588 of 2007

                            -------------------------------


                    Dated this the 16th   day  of January, 2007



                                       JUDGMENT

The petitioner feels aggrieved by the order of transfer causing

dislocation to him, when he has only a few months to retire from

service. As on the date of Ext.P1, he was working at Manjeri in the

office of the third respondent. Now he has been transferred to NH Sub

Division, Perinthalmanna for field work. It is stated that he suffers

from serious ailments and having regard to his health condition, the

respondents ought to have retained him in the same station.

Alternatively, it is stated that he could have been accommodated in a

nearby place. The petitioner has placed Ext.P2 application before the

second respondent requesting to post him in the existing open vacancy

under Roads Division, Manjeri. The above application was filed on

20.10.2006. It is seen from Ext.P5 letter written by the Executive

Engineer to the second respondent that on the retirement of

Sri.E.Muhammed Hussain, III Grade Overseer, one vacancy is likely to

arise.

2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the Government

pleader for the respondents.

W.P.(C)No.1588/2007 2

3. In the circumstances, there shall be an order directing the

second respondent to consider the request made by the petitioner in

Ext.P2, especially, in the light of the vacancy due to arise as reported

by the Executive Engineer in Ext.P5 letter, and to pass appropriate

orders, as early as possible, at any rate, before the vacancy referred

to in Ext.P5 is filled up. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the

judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second

respondent for information and compliance.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions.

K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE

css/

W.P.(C)No.1588/2007 3