High Court Kerala High Court

The Kerala State Electricity … vs Mr.P.V. Shaji on 3 January, 2007

Kerala High Court
The Kerala State Electricity … vs Mr.P.V. Shaji on 3 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 505 of 2006()


1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. MR.P.V. SHAJI, S/O.K.VASUDEVAN,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB

                For Respondent  :SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :03/01/2007

 O R D E R
                              M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.

                            ------------------------------------------

                                C.R.P.NO.505 OF 2006 (G)

                               -----------------------------------------

                         Dated this the  3rd  day of January, 2007.


                                           O R D E R

This petition is filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act to

condone the delay of 598 days in filing the revision. Revision

petition was filed challenging the order passed by Additional

District Judge, Alappuzha, in O.P.(Ele).224/96, whereunder

enhanced compensation was granted. Learned District Judge

originally granted enhancement at the rate of Rs.7,000/- per

cent. This court set aside the order and remanded the case back

to the District Court for fresh disposal. Learned District Judge

found that no further evidence was adduced by the parties.

Considering the importance of the locality, land value was fixed

only at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per cent. Learned counsel

appearing for respondent submitted that respondent had filed a

revision challenging the compensation which was dismissed by

this court holding that the enhanced compensation awarded is

reasonable. In such circumstances, there is no reason to

C.R.P.NO.505 OF 2006 (G)

2

interfere with the order of enhancement granted by learned

District Judge. Moreover, the inordinate delay of 598 days was

not explained by petitioner except saying that it is due to

administrative reasons. Even the affidavit shows that certified

copy was applied belatedly and after getting the certified copy,

the revision was filed with further delay. In such circumstances,

the absence of proper explanation for sufficiency of the delay, the

delay also cannot be condoned.

Petition and revision petition are dismissed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,

JUDGE.

bkn