Sri N Pavan vs The Secretary on 9 September, 2010

Bangalore 562 125'

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THIS THE 9?" DAY OF' sEPTEMBr«:R;'2'D1._j:  ;. A' 

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUsT1cEg s.  'V, D 1:'

WRIT PETITION No.25298/2'oQ9'w:EDN;_&r3;[;_sf) "  

BETWEEN:

Sri. N. Pavan - V f
8/0 M.N. Rao   
Aged about 36 _},re:-11fs'_'-

Secretary     . «    V
Sri. Sangameshiavafa 'Vidyaljaywa I1istiDtutions
Papanna Layaut---    * 

T. Chowd'adeVaij1ahaiii-- "

Dommasandra VP'v'.JSt_ " 2

. . . PETITION ER

(By Sri. I-Ianurna1'2.téhap}::-2;  Gowda, Adv.)

1.

A    ' ' 

Departmexit of Primary Education
G0verng:r1en,t' of Karnataka
M.S. Building

7 Bangaicre 560 001

" 'l"haDirector

Department of Primary Education



~.'"$

New Pubiic Offices
Bangalore 560 011

3. The Deputy Director of Public Instructions    
South District 3  '' ~ 0'
Kalasipalyam, Bangalore 560 0:02"  .

4. The Block Education Officer
South Range  .
South District
Anekai Taluk, Aneka}
Bangalore

5. Commissioner for Public' Ins_tru<7:tio'I1s r~ .  

Nrupathunga Road  ._ pg  
Bangalore     RESPONDENTS

(By Sri. M. Keshava ;§_¢d.dy,Igt§§;x.,_ for  »
Notice not ordered; in respectof lflto R44]

'I'I1is:VwI'it--petitrion 'ispgfiiiedunder Articles 226 and 227 of
the Constit.utio.n of.Indi'ap1'ayi;ag.--'to direct the respondents to
consider the ~.repiresentationgs"'of the petitioner dt.l2.6.2006
vide Ann-E and'etc'. .g   

 petition corriitig on for Preliminary Hearing this

 the Court rriade the following-

ORDER

The .. petitioner had made an application as per

dated 12.06.2006 requesting the 5″‘ respondent

shift his school from 91″ Block Jayanagar, Papanna

C3

.»

Layout, T. Chowdanahalh, Dominasandra Post, Ban.ga.1oi’.e_

to Anekal Taluk.

2. Learned AGA appearing for the SW ‘

submits that the 5″‘ respondent haswpassedw

08.09.2010 permitting the petitione1;’:.to1’_’shfft

terms of his application as pe;*d__}m..nex1i1v’e7E.s1i’oje’ct”~to.. the
terms and conditions mentioned _thue’rei1’i.._p_ A copyvvof the said
order is made available _the ;?;_earn–et1 ‘Counsel for the

petitioner. V

3. In kightof’ order, this writ petition
does not survive for’ ~;:on,suid.e7ration. Accordingly, it is

Vdis:.missed'<as having beco.m.e'infmctuous. No costs.

Sdfi
Tudge