IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.18471 of 2008
Date of decision: 04.08.2009
IC 12063 P Lt. Col. (T.S.) Dalvinder Singh resident of H. No.304, Sector 35-A,
Chandigarh.
......Petitioner
The Union of India, Ministry of Defence and others.
......Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI.
Present: Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Advocate for the respondents.
-----
PERMOD KOHLI, J. (ORAL)
It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that this case is
covered by a judgment of Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.8939 of 2007
decided on 6.3.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the
respondents are recovering more amount than what was paid in lump sum to the
petitioner in the form of commuted value. This fact is disputed by the other side.
In view of the judgment referred above, this petition is dismissed. However, the
petitioner is at liberty to make appropriate representation to the respondents
regarding excess recovery, if any. If such a representation is filed within a period
of one month, the same shall be decided by the respondents by passing a speaking
and well reasoned order thereafter within a period of four months, in accordance
with law.
(PERMOD KOHLI)
August 4, 2009 JUDGE
Poonam