High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Mukhiya Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Mukhiya Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 March, 2011
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Cr.Misc. No.44291 of 2010
                              MUKHIYA YADAV SON OF RAJAN YADAV
                                                 Versus
                                       THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                               -----------

2. 15.3.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence u/ss.341, 323 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that from the facts of the case

it is apparent that it is not a case u/s.302 I.P.C. and the death

had taken place six days after the occurrence as also that the

petitioner has fair antecedents.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above

named, who is in custody since 17.7.2010, be released on bail

on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be

fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of C.J.M.,

Jehanabad in Kako P.S. case No.108 of 2010, subject to the

conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the wife of the

petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the Court about any change in address

of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that

the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is

he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also
-2-

state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v)

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )