Gujarat High Court High Court

Harish vs Unknown on 15 July, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Harish vs Unknown on 15 July, 2010
Author: Rajesh H.Shukla,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.A/1542/2009	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1542 of 2009
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE RAJESH H.SHUKLA
 
 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================
 

HARISH
@ MELABHAI BABUBHAI PADHIYAR - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Opponent(s)
 

========================================= 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH
JAIL for
Appellant(s) : 1,MS GR VIJAYALAKSHMI for Appellant(s) : 1, 
MR LR
POOJARI, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Opponent(s) :
1, 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAJESH H.SHUKLA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 15/07/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

The
present appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed in
Sessions Case No. 243/2004 by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast
Track Court No. 5, Vadodara, dated 10.2.2005 recording the conviction
of the accused for offence under sec. 363, 366 and 376 of IPC and
also imposing sentence and the fine, as stated in detail in the
order. However, learned APP Mr. Poojari has placed on record the jail
remark sheet as suggested by learned advocate Ms. Vijayalakshmi for
the appellant accused stating that he has served the sentence
already.

As
it appears from the jail remark sheet, the appellant original accused
has already been released after considering the sentence undergone
earlier and also considering the Resolution of the Government dated
29.4.2010 on the occasion of Swarnim Jayanti celebrations of the
State. It is stated that he has already been released on 1.5.2010.

Therefore,
the present appeal stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Rajesh
H. Shukla, J.)

(hn)

   

Top