Prabhamani vs B K Gowramma on 22 June, 2009

1

RFA N{3.1(}65f290'8

IN THE HIGH comm 012' KARNATAKA AT B;§.i."~E€§?2;-A.iV_'..(V,"'.4"i'{"}'."'*;,.f.V_""'.  2

DATED THIS THE 22% DAY (>1? axing'.  

BEFORE.'  "3

THE HOIIFBLE ma. .:tJs*':*z::_<::'E,_%1<;. fi'Hgx1§f»::;vA'rs.uA

REGLFLAR FIRST APPE!¥.£;'NG...1066f20Q8"{§§P)

BETWEEN:

1. Prabhatnani, 58:y'e;:1rs,:"
W / 0. Venkatara1na1i§.appa,::._

No.1,, Laggerc:.\r'i1ia.gté,._ ,.¥;".~s:e11y:_35 P.<;st--,fi if V '

Bangalore ---  

2. N.PI'a:3ad 1<u.n:;.ar, 3§2'3*ea.»:.s;,

S/o. Natarajruz Ché:.ttiai=,»    * -
200, II Mam Road,  Layout,
Bax1ga1ora-"5f60086.  '  '

3. N.1,.-gflisiami,  V.

 " "us;  
 206, H Main Read, Mahalaxmi Layout,
' --¥3anga1qre:._._.--' 559 035.

4.  ;7() years,
S] G. "iiarivfiowda,

 Isaac No.23;z_3, sy. No.8/3,
= V  Llaggcre Viflage, Pcenya Post,
»1_':3a;1'g2aipr¢ -- 56%} 058.

 _ "««-'5.V'.Lakkamma, 56 years,
 w. Wfo. G.Venkatappa,
 v N{). 11.21, 4&1 8 Cross,
«~ Sriramanagar, Mahalaxmi Layout,

Bangalore «--- 568 086.

Appellants

(By Sri.K.S.Desa.i. 8:. Harsh Desai, Adv. for appaflaat)



RFA N0.1066f2(§08

AND;

3.. BK. Gowrazama,

41 years, W/0. Rajaxma,

Ne. 13, Anjaneya Tempic §¥ Street,
Link Road, Seshdripur.-am,
Bangalore -- 560 020.

2. Venkatappa,
'73 years, S/o.Gurappa,

No.198, Laggere Village,   .   
Peenya, Bangalore --- 560 058. " '  *       _ ' Respondents

(By Sri 9 R sundazesh, fi(ivv:,"f&r  ' . 
(133; Sri O Shivaram"'£3h;7¢,' Adan, 2"<;~::'R-'2}   V. 

This t2eg:i1a:+ffix~siA i'1};1=Qd"11i}1der section 96 cm against
the jucigzaaeixi a:1dV V  ciafed 28.02.2007 passed in ()8 No.
1277/1999 on the tilt: ~of.:'he_.  ma}. City Civil Judge, Bangalore.
CCZH~8, decreeing thc stzitflézi tefms of compromise petition.

Thisgfipgcal  ofi fair Oréers this day, the Court daiiveraci
 I  z  ..... .. H

JUDGMENT

Léa:_negiv~CQfi.=fiSei for ‘thfi appeiiants files a memo. The memo is

” “c*9uutt§19$_i:gned by the appeflants.

— ‘”2:. §:iAth¢: Eight of the meme flied by the learned Counsel for the

‘ Tapj:V}e’l1éfits, the Appcai is dismissazzd as withcirawn with iiberiy take all}

K___mmvW,,. .

RFA. N3. E 06652098

3

such contentions in fsixecution Case: N0.S88/ £>d0{)’?’7£)§1

Civil Judgfi, Eangalere City, in accoI’d£ii1fEie’v:<i§§i..'la\;z.,' V

In View of the above, fl1eVsR§:gistét;'y._v'iS V 1T:<§

Court fee, in accordamzcz with law.

Since the c:(>»appe11z%a1″ii;.V::s«’hF:1:9.’:\*§;v –_fl1at the Ceurt refilnd
chfique may be iszé-magi in:”f1ié:* Kumarj appellant
No.2, the Regjsfiy’ Court fee fl in
favour ‘-

Si/ai

N0  ' . V'     h 

  Bjs A