Sri S Prasanna Kumar vs State Of Karnataka on 24 February, 2010

mwwam MW mmmwmmmm mmam mgwwmafiw Kfifiimfifiiflfifim Mmfifi fiflfifl? W5' mmmmm HEQH CQURT 0? KAR?éW§'flK7A HEQH fiflkmf fig; %%%?%E&"?%.Ké% Efifirfi QQUR

_. 1 .-

114 'IT-IE HIGH Comm' 0!? KARNATAKA AT  %  %  
mmm ms THE 24%! my €)F_IifE13RUAii"x'--i§2§3:1tf:  _ é %  

BEFORE  

rem Hosmz MR.JUS'HC;*?§__L-.;iARi4§Y%ANA 

 %

sax.  
AGEDAB@IT$3¥gEAR:'$.,  _ 
szoasmmzaa, %    %
we saw, J.C.E,&3'OL"P,_V  A  
   

KANAIwkg:~  _    "   V'

for the afifmtwe  304-B,
302:-aadwith      %

2*   petiticemr is a
   rm to bolt after the
age-aid    shim. Tm allsmtiens

V  faha and them am no eye

    met with an acmdm' t and D3?

siti;-gx       placed and in case tm petitionm

 

 73 bail, he win sugar so aka his ssatm.

   'ijfi.V$*;*.:e.L.4_.'hé'§'aya :39: mm sfbaii.

  3I§' {mm mmml far the rmpommt submita

T  no eyewmm" afi, but an the bask

 icsf cflwmfaxms and matwiab and thfi way im which

M-Wwflfi wz" fmmmwmamwm mmw ££..§%.«.M€x';|¥.--€J;;¥;.fF m%RN£%IE"fiaKA Hfifitfi EJUUW' 0%" §(flaflN&'§°;%W~% HIGH CGUR"? Q? KAQNAYANA §"§§¢'€3§-1% C@i.§W'§' £3?" fifififiifiiffiaflfi Hmvfl fiflfifi

&mpeflf:&nm*hdbgMmmw amefim1m

agaMt1%w=n§?§;f'¢,it*smtam%fnr gfanfim heal

 

 
 



WWW W mmmmm mm %mWK%,.'w;&'r mum-mm mm mum W mmmnm Mum: mam W mmgmm mm»; mam W Kmmvmm mm mm

..3.,

by the awner of the Edge in  mteg% as; V  
25.<:3.2m that: petmam mm  
am mm room by gazing has   A

and an f2'?.03.2008   the
mmpam and this um%%  ;mabm of

 

mm    

me: ibund the  %    5  
5.  ----   griéaent state since: the
sumrmg  pa-cums and echo mm

   %.rrifi. aiatm and age
 to his small idclg I am of the viaw

  mg  'm mama far bail.

5. ~  the max: this wfiblon is a1zam,Wmg

.   gm paetit§?fl!31' with fouewmg madam' * .

 i} Fefifinm' 31% mmcute 3 bond fin!'
Rs.15,G0<3l- abm with em surety far
Ifiumtafixesatimfacfinnafflmcanrt

fv«<'
'if
1.

E
1

mm