High Court Kerala High Court

Savithrikutty Amma vs The Taluk Land Board on 1 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
Savithrikutty Amma vs The Taluk Land Board on 1 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 550 of 2005()


1. SAVITHRIKUTTY AMMA, W/O. SOMASEKHARAN
                      ...  Petitioner
2. DEEPA @ MRINALINI, D/O. SOMASEKHARAN

                        Vs



1. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, PALAKKAD
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

3. P.M. NARAYANAN, S/O. P.M. NEELAKNTAN

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

 Dated :01/08/2007

 O R D E R
                         PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J.
               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                          C.R.P.No.550 of 2005
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                         Dated: 1st August, 2007

                                   ORDER

A claimant under Section 85(8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act

is aggrieved by the order passed by the Taluk Land Board negativing

the claim mainly on the reason that the documents relied on are all

subsequent to 1.1.1970. My attention was drawn by Mr.Sajan

Varghese, learned counsel for the revision petitioners to Act 21 of

2006 under which Section 7E was introduced into the Land Reforms

Act and corresponding amendments were made to Section 84.

Mr.Shyson P.Manguzha, learned Government Pleader would submit

that the Taluk Land Board has also observed that it is on the basis of

an invalid document (a gift deed written on white paper) that the

documents of title claimed by the petitioners were executed in their

favour. But I find that the decision of the Taluk Land Board turns not

on the above reason but on the reason that the documents are

executed after 1.1.1970. I therefore set aside the impugned order

and direct the Taluk Land Board, Palakkad to take a fresh decision.

The Taluk Land Board will take into account the implications of the

amending act, Act 21 of 2006 including the implication of newly

introduced Section 7E. The validity of the title also can be considered

C.R.P.No.550/05 – 2 –

by the Taluk Land Board. Fresh decision as directed above will be

taken by the Taluk Land Board after hearing the petitioners and

anybody else who may be affected by the order.

The C.R.P. is allowed to the above extent. No costs.

srd                                PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE