IN THE HIGH COURT op KARh?ATAKA,"_BA,$i(§;fiL{)RE
DATED THE 22%» DAY 0EA?;éH. 2:309 » = "
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. '§;'I§§§RAYAbiA"S'WAMY
wan' msrrmon rib; M {I ;
BETWEEN
1
MR. KAF?KA;';MANSO'-Ci}? 'Am
S /O_I.,A'I'E»K; A;BDL?L
AGED 55 YEARS,' %
289,?.._I-Iii} 1a2MvfkIA1%STAz3E%% '
4'93 MAIN, 15THfCRQjSS""
DOLLARS COL«'.)NY A
B.i§..."*¥(}_A1,0RI3--':'360094' PE'I'ITIONER
(By sIé1*:A;%1§ sLr5BA:AH$ ADvocATE )
3'rA':*E 0? KARNATAKA
BY SECRETARY
. REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VVM3 BUILDING,
BANGALORE
*' TZTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
DODDABALLAPUTR SUB DIVTSION,
PODIUM BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR,
VISWESHWARAYA TOWER,
BANGALORE AK
3 THE THASHILDAR
DEVANAHALLI TALUK I
DEVANAHALLI
4 THE DEPUTY COMMISJSIONER
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRILCST'
"~-..f..L'RESPONDENTS
(By SR1 RKUMAR HOG? Fee :22 5159123; ':V2S}i5VOCATE)
THIS WRI1' '*PETI_'I§1'ON« FILED FRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED EENl}'QRSEM'E1§{'oFSV.. .:_~I'iS--SU£3D BY THE R3,
D'I'.7. 1.09, 0,? THE R2 DT.5.1.09M A
COPY OF ?NH1cH.;3s HTEREEHPRODUCED AS ANN--H 65 ANN--J
RESPECHVELY H0igDING";fP As vom ABINITIO.
THIS W"RIfI' P1:*rrfIoi~s::eoi«aINo ON FOR HEARING THIS
DAY, Tnooooumi MAEDEITHE F'OLLOWINCr:~--
ORDER
earlier approached this court in WP No.
egsgs/2oo3.o.eL . The same came to be disposed of on
1o[jo3/2903 with a direcfion to the Tahsildar Devana Halli to
the application of the petitioner for Phodi and.
_f?£:z2dbast11 expeditiously. Since the said order was not
complied, the petitioner preferred a contempt wee in (300 No.
°Y
3
575/ 2008 which came to be dropped on the ‘mass
that an Phocii work has already been done
en endcrsement was produced to “I K
ecunsel submitted that the euClru’semerit%-
escape from the contempt. drew my
attention to the letter 13%;. 1. tfiotnmissioner
dated 19/ow 2003 informed the
Assistant Ex~Se-rvioeman
the ll of the land in
question he the location of the schedulw
land. In the ape;-deva paman MR No. 35/05-06 and 47/06-
;j’t’)'”?. _ Q aside ‘requested to decide the appeal in
Hence, the leamm ceunsel for the
. that there are 2 independent versions
u made by théwahsixdar. He has stated in his letter addmsm
Assistant Commissioner dated 19/05/2008 as per
‘}§11ne§x11xe-C that the Qsamuel himsetf is in occupation of the
” ‘Lind. He has also pointed out that an error is co1m:m’tl;ed in
3 the ofiiee which requires to be rectified. This shows that
°I’
5
With these observations, this writ
The time for compliance is 3
of copy of this order.
BSV