High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Nath Ram vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 7 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Nath Ram vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 7 July, 2010
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                       Cr.Misc. No.45408 of 2008
                    Ram Nath Ram son of Late Birja Ram, R/o Ahirani (Ambedkar Nagar)
                   Bagaha, Ward no. 28 P.S. Bagaha, Dist. West Champaran.
                                                                               ----Petitioner
                                                Versus
               1. The State of Bihar.
               2. Smt. Anju Devi D/o late Durga Ram, R/o Medical Hospital Qr. No. 108
                  Khagaul P.S. Khagaul, Dist. Patna at present residing at Machhuatoli Arya
                  kumar Road, P.S. Kadamkuam, Dist. Patna.
                                                                      ----- Opp.Parties.
                                                  -----------

02. 07.07.2010 Heard both sides.

Petitioner, who is informant of Bagaha P.S. case no. 434 of

2007, instituted under Sections 379 and 498 of the Penal Code seeks

cancellation of bail granted to his wife ( Smt. Anju Devi) by order

dated 23.07.2008, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Bagaha. Opposite party no.2 had approached the Sessions

Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah for grant of anticipatory bail which

was disposed of in the following manner:-

“……..Considering the aforesaid facts
and circumstances of this case, specially the
allegation U/s 379 of the I.P.C. is mere ornamental as
such the petitioner is directed to surrender before the
learned court below and if surrender then the learned
court below shall consider the same accordingly as
such this application is disposed of.”

In view of the said observation of the learned Sessions

Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah, learned Court below has granted bail

to the opposite party no.2 herein. This Court finds absolutely no

justification for allowing the prayer of the informant/petitioner. There

is no merit in the application.

It is, accordingly, dismissed.

Sym                                                           ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)