High Court Karnataka High Court

Lakshmi Surya vs Manager on 3 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Lakshmi Surya vs Manager on 3 July, 2008
Author: N.Kumar
1. Mwageru 'V » V

{N THE HIGH coum or KARNATAKA. AT  .

Dated this the am day ofauly, 2098  V   

BEFORE 
'I'I'iE I-I(.1I€'BLE MR. \¥H_$TI€41a5§A   V' 1 V
Writ Péziiirinrz No. 1?539é%{§f' 2007 %((::»m;=i':s1    %
fifflfii
Lak$.hmiS'111ya '- V V
Aged about 455 }'€EE!J"";§~ V   
R131"; 264; 133?' ' '_'-- '

Sarza§Wathi}_:n.1rafi1 5: J  . "
E/'iyso:'e '  

. . . Petitioner

_ .{  VR'a.1::fia§§ha11dra, Advaucate)

fi'-fie' Bank of"1m1.i_;«3_¢ .
& "Sa1'é1§ar Patel Road. Brafich

2. = Thtét Afagihdiizezi Gifimr
A  «r3f'i:adia
Karizataka Zena} Asset Recovery D€.pa1'i33:1€:t1t
 ms'. 1 11, KG. Road
'A : Ba11g'a1c2r:: - {3§

.., Respondczlts

\/

(By Sri IVLL. Qayalzanda Kama)", Advcreate)



__S¢:t;:*<f.1'¢::::'1:_§ V 23(2)  1:;3£4) of the Sectiritisation and

QRece1;3irt1§::%:im;1"'«--._C»f Financial Assats and Enforccmetnt of

 _chai1éi:~.gcd_  'E335; this: petiitjonezr befcnre the {fights Rf':C€)Vt':)."'y

W " 'T  Eiicbts Rezmvary Tribunal sat aside the aforemd

This Writ Petition is filed unvrititr fi§:r'£3't:i¢i"i;§é :;o--?:the;
Pffiiliontzx'. =    .    

Thia Wiiit Pefitiml -::(:1:t1:i31g'>::a;i?i" -figr isfeiiminajgq  this * V

day, the CiZ>'t1l"'i made: the fo11<:;wi.ng:"= *

 .

Th: petitioner is sc.r:l(‘i§1.gA Writ ptflition to

Kanti £}V€tiI’ the: pas- .=%§c§asi€>:§A ‘:~V,%{£1ci’:’:VA’.~”:’¥;(“}_J1.§.1’l::§iif’l.1i}li’»iY I pmpgygy to the
petiiiaoner. L V

‘2, :;;;:xf I’;§;Tl:_EVE.~.:i!;(3f’:T.£’iVI..i’1I*Tfi,£,’3;’l”§ is» that she had avaficd

fi:1ancia.1VV’vfacé}1%§: A ii1,é “@§1:3¢;}11i:im:t~Ba11k§ For the defauli:

ccammiiitzci ii: Lgfipayfizcfit’ of financial facility, I1{)’£”i{3€3 llifldfii’

SéC.I__11ii.fi3: V’§Ii§:x3.§ft3£§-ii:”~’;5sCt, 2002 was is:-guttri. The same was

V,

S’£lp§}I'{*?SS€£i $31935 material aspects ami 013 thig shun. gi€fi2;nd

fhe petition is liaiaie ts.) be dismissed.

4, I have hflard 1€8I’11(“Jd”[:’§§§’)11I1é»V€’%2,’_v’§:fi1′

5: Thr: mai:&I*ia3vr..:::: mcrcggrtii’ veariéier nmtice
issued by the Bank’ both aild 13(4) of the
Acéi: was sat ” Tzibxlnal. T he
pfiffifiollfil’ his loan
aczcaeuxrnt .. T ‘is dated 11102006.

Having }:1¢a;13« ‘§:h(;11’t. sight manths, when tins:

petifioney *npf ;;iLé}(c payment mid mglzlarizfi his

_ ace@1;1;§§t,’V the:-. 1’es}§«:3jjt1é11tS issued notice, unclcr Secrtion 13(2) of

Whcm the petifigner rafused to mcsive

r1’:§ii:;§i: have published the said neitica in the Imws

_ ‘P31-,§.r-5».., me’ Hindtz and Udaya Vani on o3,pt:ia.r::;1 except {:3 invtake. the pawepr cenferitfi on than under

gkgpiv

V1

Section 13(4) 0f the A-ci and thety hava taken posse3si(mV;Tt}1c

piupexiy .

6. The action of the 1*e3ponci’eiii”is:. Iggal
tie not stiffer from any 3′.3}c:gali’ty,V
thtzse facts. Even othenxzisé, ‘me :1;é§’sap(§I;riVg:éb1:2_j£t$2}(en”
pogsassion of the pI'(}§3€I’il_Y ‘1é’1.:~:’-,,.i,fv 1§”ea1i}’ the
petitigner is aggxéevati hf to approach the.
{Debts Rtzcovezy Trfibugaal {-11:51 agitate
her rights. 1;}.-tizgejft. ptgtition is not
mainfmhgbéig ‘/;%”‘::’i::’.’¥i;’VV’E?l:ii”lT€f’;¥f’,’€1-f–1’f3i’§i’€; and $fi’i::a<:?:i

The ‘};’) §f1i’I1i1 “‘€)réié; . 4:-f~:.V€.ay gI”anif;3£:i by this Court is

‘–ya¢,ai¢:zi, ”