IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
BEFORE
THE HONELE MR.JUS'?ICEHVA.S.I3'G1?;_Pg.'\H:\TI§{ "
M.F.A. NO. 3916/2:QO61-({:PC3}.. ": 4% A
BETWEEN : " '
I SR1 M L VASUDEVA MURTITE' _
S/O LATE M LAOHAIAH S}'h"JT_i'Y
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS ' I
2 SMT. PARVATPIAVARDHANA S , ;V ..
W/O SR1 M.L'JASI§JDEVA. MURT_H'{"- *
AGED ABOUf;P'76 YEARS * _
BOTH :.AI:E.T1'CO.EI«"EE PLANTERS .
R/OF LAL1.'TH~'\ I=>RASA;OAI»'1..»*
HO.SAMA.NE EXTENSVI_O1\§ ~
C?f{IKNIA(}2'\LUE?, C£TY:577 101
New 'A'? SESIIAPPA
FORT, 'CH1I{MAQ,ALIJI?%«.--»~'577 101
* " V »-- ...APPELLAN'1'S
(BY M INEUS LAW EY SR1 G SRIDHAR,
'~ SKI V SRKNIVAS , SR1 M NIKHILESH RAO
81 SMT. PRITHA SRIKUMAR, ADVS.)
3 SR1 M V GANESH PRASAD
--. "S/O SRT.1__\.cI L VASUDEVA MURTHY
' .j~A€.+E{_)a ABOUT 44. YEARS
- T 'E/VOE.SHNAI<RUPA
BEHIND LALITHA PRASADAM
E0. E0. NO. 153
g
HOSAMAN E EXTENSION
CHIKAMAGALUR RESPONDENT
{BY SR1 M V GANESH PRASAD, ASV.)
THIS APPEAL IS FELED U/O R01 (0) AGA:Ns:f ‘N
THE ORDER DATED 22.12.2005 P;Assf:+:D;.GN “1_.A._ M0,. IN
RA.No. 233/2004 {ORIGINALLY RAND. *2/2001~} ON ‘I’H’E”«FIL.E
OF THE I/C ADDL.SESSIQ§’JS JU-po-13, CI-ILKMAGALIJR,
ALLOWING LA. NO. 5 AND RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTSVV
THEREIN FROM FELLING ANY FURT§tIER ‘STANDING IN
THE DISPUTE-JD LAND/A_.ESTAT.E«– _’F1LL–.., DISF’OS_AI,_,’ OF THE
APPEAL. V ‘ .. .
This Appeal? this day. the
Court de1ivere€1vtl0feo’ 11.owii1gV: V
NNNN
Thzouggh the: for admission along with
an appljcatidon Vforeofidofiation of delay, at this juncture, it
“is that”A-the appeai, which arisa from the interlocutory
/2001 has now become infruetuous
inaS1:iue1’1~as:’..-tide regular appeal before the Lower Appellate
“-._V:Coup1*t already been disposed of.
i
Therefore, the present appeal is disposed of as
infruetuous, leaving 3.11 contentions with regard to the
merits to be urged in the suit. N0 order as to costs.
hrp /bms