High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Banshi Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 23 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Banshi Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 23 August, 2010
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Cr.Misc. No.22300 of 2010
                 BANSHI YADAV, S/o Gholti Yadav.
                              Versus
                       THE STATE OF BIHAR
                             -----------

03. 23.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian

Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the petitioner is not named

in the First Information Report and subsequently he

was named in the confessional statement of the co-

accused, Munna Singh for which he is in custody

since 03.05.2010 and he has no criminal antecedent,

let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each or any

other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction

of 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Naugachhia in

connection with S.C. No. 28A of 2006 arising out of

Bihpur P.S. Case No. 104 of 2001 (Tr. No. 394 of

2010) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one

of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how
2

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change

in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit

shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state

on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioner is implicated in any other case of

similar nature after his release in the present case

and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to

initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the

ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for charge

and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner

will be well represented on each date and if he fails to

do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable

to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-